Alignment of Carbon Nanotubes in Electric Fields: How and Why?

AI Thread Summary
Conducting carbon nanotubes align their primary axes with static electric fields due to the influence of electric field gradients. The alignment minimizes the electric field within the nanotubes, resulting in a lower energy state. Additionally, the proximity of charges at each end of the nanotube to opposite electrodes may contribute to this behavior. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for applications in nanotechnology and materials science. The discussion highlights the importance of electric field interactions in the behavior of carbon nanotubes.
Cesium
Messages
273
Reaction score
0
Conducting carbon nanotubes align their primary axises in the direction of static electric field. Why is this?

I am thinking that it's because since this is their longer axis, the gradient of the generated electric field within the nanotubes will be less than in the perpendicular case. Is this the right way to think about this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Or, alternatively, is it because the charges at the each end of the nanotube will be closer to the electrode of the opposite charge?
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top