Alkene reaction with Br2 and NaCl (saturated)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Snoop06
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Alkene Reaction
AI Thread Summary
In the reaction of alkenes with Br2 and NaCl, Cl is more reactive but less selective than Br, leading to Cl adding first to the alkene. The bromonium ion intermediate is formed when Br+ attaches to the pi bond, followed by competition between Br- and Cl- as nucleophiles. The nucleophile that adds will do so in a Markovnikov fashion, favoring the more substituted carbon, which is particularly relevant if Cl- is the one that adds. Understanding the structure of the intermediate and the resonance forms can clarify the mechanism. This discussion highlights the importance of recognizing the roles of electrophiles and nucleophiles in such reactions.
Snoop06
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I am studying for an exam tomorrow and can't seem to find this mechanism anywhere. I know that a Br and a Cl are added in Markovnikov fashion but I don't know which would be added first and which would go on the more substituted carbon. Any help is appreciated.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a marked difference of the 'reactivity' and 'selectivity' between Br and Cl. Cl is more reactive than Br and Br is more selective than Cl. Therefore Cl would be added first and Br would go to the substituted carbon.

You may want to visit this site for organic reactions and there mechanisms

http://www.organic-chemistry.org/reactions.htm"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Himanshu said:
There is a marked difference of the 'reactivity' and 'selectivity' between Br and Cl. Cl is more reactive than Br and Br is more selective than Cl. Therefore Cl would be added first and Br would go to the substituted carbon.

You may want to visit this site for organic reactions and there mechanisms

http://www.organic-chemistry.org/reactions.htm"

Thank you :)

I bookmarked that page for future use, I'd never been there before but it seems like it has a lot of good info.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the electrophile Br(d+) will first attach to the pi bond in the alkene, then there will be a selection between Cl- and Br-.
 
Last edited:
Just wanted to confirm the answer for the OP since there have been two different responses to this question. Kushal is correct, I think Himanshu is confusing the problem with another issue.

Typically only electrophiles can add to a pi bond. Therefore NaCl, which is a source of Cl-, will not add first. Only Br2 can act as an electrophile source, by adding Br+ to the pi bond, forming a bromonium ion intermediate and Br-.

At this point there will be competition between the two nucleophiles present, Br- and Cl-. Either way the nucleophile will add with a specific stereochemistry. The nucleophile will also add in a markovnikov fashion to the more substituted carbon, but this will only be relevant if Cl- adds. I'll leave it to you to explain why it occurs this way. HINT: Think of the structure of the intermediate. Make a model if you need to, it may be helpful to use tubing to form some of the bond angles. Also, draw the resonance structures of a halonium ion and the actual structure, and think about how the charge is concentrated on the two carbons.

I'm not sure which nucleophile would add faster in the second step, does anyone else know?
 
Spirochete said:
Just wanted to confirm the answer for the OP since there have been two different responses to this question. Kushal is correct, I think Himanshu is confusing the problem with another issue.

Typically only electrophiles can add to a pi bond. Therefore NaCl, which is a source of Cl-, will not add first. Only Br2 can act as an electrophile source, by adding Br+ to the pi bond, forming a bromonium ion intermediate and Br-.

At this point there will be competition between the two nucleophiles present, Br- and Cl-. Either way the nucleophile will add with a specific stereochemistry. The nucleophile will also add in a markovnikov fashion to the more substituted carbon, but this will only be relevant if Cl- adds. I'll leave it to you to explain why it occurs this way. HINT: Think of the structure of the intermediate. Make a model if you need to, it may be helpful to use tubing to form some of the bond angles. Also, draw the resonance structures of a halonium ion and the actual structure, and think about how the charge is concentrated on the two carbons.

I'm not sure which nucleophile would add faster in the second step, does anyone else know?

Ah I see now, I didn't even realize the Cl would be a nucleophile (it makes sense that it is, I just didn't look at it that way for some reason).

Thanks for clearing that up.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top