Allowed Reactions: Process 1-5 Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter genloz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactions
genloz
Messages
72
Reaction score
1
I would really just like to know if I'm on the right track here in terms of if reactions can go ahead or not... The reactions are in latex and my thoughts are below each one..

Homework Statement


For each of the following processes say whether it is a strong, electromagnetic or weak process or whether it is forbidden in the standard model and explain the reasons.

Process 1
K^{0} \rightarrow \pi^{+}+e^{-}
Charge conserved
Mass conserved
Lepton Number - not conserved
Baryon Number - no baryons
Spin - (-1/3)(1/3) -> (2/3)(1/3) + (1/2) not conserved
Strangeness - not conserved
Therefore not possible
It would have been a weak interaction though?

Process 2
e^{-}+p \rightarrow n+\upsilon_{\mu} (the final thing should be a muon neutrino)
Charge conserved
Mass conserved
Lepton Number - not conserved
Baryon Number - conserved
Spin - (1/2) + (1/2) -> (1/2) + (0) not conserved
Strangeness - conserved
Therefore not possible
It would have been a weak interaction though?

Process 3
\Delta^{0} \rightarrow \pi^{+}+n
Charge conserved
Mass conserved
Lepton Number - no leptons
Baryon Number - conserved
Spin - ? -> 0 + (1/2) no idea
Strangeness - conserved
Therefore possible? (dependent on spin)
It would be a weak interaction

Process 4
K^{0} + n \rightarrow \Lambda + \pi^{0}
Charge conserved
Mass conserved
Lepton Number - no leptons
Baryon Number - ?
Spin - ?
Strangeness - not conserved (s in the K, anti-s in the lambda)
Therefore possible? (dependent on spin & baryon number)
It would be a weak interaction

Process 5
\Xi^{0} \rightarrow \Lambda + \pi^{0}
Charge conserved
Mass conserved
Lepton Number - no leptons
Baryon Number - ?
Spin - ?
Strangeness - not conserved (ss in the Xi, s in the lambda)
Therefore possible? (dependent on spin)
It would be a weak interaction


Also, In what situation would it be a strong interaction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, I think processes 3,4 and 5 are strong interactions rather than weak...
 
Okay, process 3 also isn't possible due to the delta having spin 3/2, the pion having spin 0 and the neutron having spin 1/2 so this is also impossible due to spin not being conserved?

Process 4
Baryon Number 0 + 1 -> 1 + 0, conserved
Spin 0 + 1/2 -> 1/2 + 0, conserved
So process 4 is possible...

Process 5
Baryon Number 1 -> 1 + 0 conserved
Spin - can't find out the spin for Xi, -> 1/2 + 0
So it's not possible due to lack of strangeness conservation and possibly spin but unsure on this point??

Please let me know if I'm on the right track here!
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top