Almost-universe-sized black hole

  • Thread starter Thread starter Meatbot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole
Meatbot
Messages
146
Reaction score
1
What if acceleration is really an attraction to something surrounding us?

What would happen if a black hole gained size over the history of the universe until it comprised a huge percentage of the universe? And what if that universe was curved so that as the black hole expanded, it began to approach itself on the other side, like drawing larger and larger circles on a ball? What would the observer in the remaining part of the universe see as this black hole closed up? Wouldn't it look like accelerating expansion as the galaxies are pulled toward the monster black hole all around them with greater and greater force? Does this model have any correlation with anything in the real world or am I a crackpot? Has anyone looked at this?

Basically the idea is: What if expansion is really being attracted to something which surrounds us instead of being propelled outward from within?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Meatbot said:
Basically the idea is: What if expansion is really being attracted to something which surrounds us instead of being propelled outward from within?
Then the velocities of galaxies would not be proportional to the distance, contradicting the observed Hubble law (or perhaps we would have a privileged role of being in the center of the universe).
And of course, there would be no cosmic microwave background.

But this belongs to the Cosmology subforum.
 
Last edited:
Demystifier said:
Then the velocities of galaxies would not be proportional to the distance, contradicting the observed Hubble law (or perhaps we would have a privileged role of being in the center of the universe).
And of course, there would be no cosmic microwave background.

But this belongs to the Cosmology subforum.

What if it was so far away that even if you weren't exactly in the center you wouldn't be able to get enough accuracy on your measurements to tell the difference?

Cosmic background is a big problem, though. I didn't think of that. Any way that the cosmic background could be closer to us than the event horizon of this black hole? What if it's actually the material falling into it? It's a stretch I know.

Sorry about posting to the wrong subforum.
 
Last edited:
Meatbot said:
What if it was so far away that even if you weren't exactly in the center you wouldn't be able to get enough accuracy on your measurements to tell the difference?
But that means we're pretty much in the centre of the universe (since your black hole is on the same scale as the size of the universe). This does not agree with the cosmological principle.

Sorry about posting to the wrong subforum.

Yes, this is cosmology and thus, if appropriate to any forum, would belong there.
 
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
Many of us have heard of "twistors", arguably Roger Penrose's biggest contribution to theoretical physics. Twistor space is a space which maps nonlocally onto physical space-time; in particular, lightlike structures in space-time, like null lines and light cones, become much more "local" in twistor space. For various reasons, Penrose thought that twistor space was possibly a more fundamental arena for theoretical physics than space-time, and for many years he and a hardy band of mostly...
Back
Top