B Alpha particle in a force field depiction

hawkslime
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Can someone give me an explanation of the below picture, please?
Hello, I was glazing through what I would consider an advanced physics textbook and I saw this image. It is a schematic picture of an alpha-particle in a field of an atom.

Now, can someone get me started on what (and why and how) is going on in it? Especially with the fraction with pi.

20200721_190744.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
Can you please give a reference; Title; Author; ISBN; Page number.
 
The alpha particle approaches a positively charged nucleus, it is repelled and its path is deflected by an angle ##\theta##. The rest is just geometry. The sum of the two angles with the fraction is ##\pi-\theta## because these two plus the ##\theta## angle must add up to ##\pi##. The dashed line is going through the point of closest approach. The particle trajectory is symmetric with respect to that line, so both sides of it have half of the ##\pi-\theta## angle.
 
mfb said:
The alpha particle approaches a positively charged nucleus, it is repelled and its path is deflected by an angle ##\theta##. The rest is just geometry. The sum of the two angles with the fraction is ##\pi-\theta## because these two plus the ##\theta## angle must add up to ##\pi##. The dashed line is going through the point of closest approach. The particle trajectory is symmetric with respect to that line, so both sides of it have half of the ##\pi-\theta## angle.
Thank you.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
892
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top