Alternate Representations of Lorentz Generators Mμν

sshaep
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I know the representations of Lorentz generators M\mu\nu as 4X4 matrices.

This matrices satisfy the commutation relation(Lie algebra of O(3,1))

However I think these 4X4 matrix representations are not unique.

Is there any other representations satisfying the commutation relation? 2X2 matrix or

another?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, there are infinitely many representations of the Lorentz algebra. One trivial example is to form a set of 8x8 matrices by taking the Kronecker product of M with the 2x2 identity.
 
sshaep said:
Is there any other representations satisfying the commutation relation? 2X2 matrix or another?

Because SL \left(2 , \mathbb{C} \right) is the universal cover of the restricted Lorentz group, they have isomorphic Lie algebras.
 
George Jones said:
Because SL \left(2 , \mathbb{C} \right) is the universal cover of the restricted Lorentz group, they have isomorphic Lie algebras.

This means can I get the 2x2 representation of M\mu\nu from SL(2,C)?

But how? What I know is \sigma_{\mu}A^{\mu} _{\phantom{\mu}\nu}}=L\sigma_{\nu}L^{\dagger}
 
Take

<br /> M^{0i} = \frac{i}{2} \sigma^{i}, \ \ M^{ij} = \frac{1}{2} \epsilon^{ijk}\sigma^{k}<br />

Also, if you define

\omega_{i0} = 2 Re(\alpha_{i}), \ \ \omega_{ij} = 2 \epsilon^{ijk} Im(\alpha_{k})

then

<br /> 1 + \frac{i}{2}\omega_{\mu\nu}M^{\mu\nu} = \left( \begin {array}{rr} (1 + \alpha_{3}) &amp; (\alpha_{1} - i \alpha_{2}) \\ (\alpha_{1} + i \alpha_{2}) &amp; (1 - \alpha_{3}) \end {array} \right)<br />

represents elements of SL(2,C) infinitesimally close to the identity element.

regards

sam
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
Back
Top