ALVAC-AIDSVAX Vaccine: Risk of Infection Reduced by 31%

  • Thread starter Thread starter Borek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vaccine
Borek
Mentor
Messages
29,123
Reaction score
4,541
It hit the news in a last few days, you have probably heard about it. That's what I have found about the trial:

New infections occurred in 51 of the 8,197 given vaccine and in 74 of the 8,198 who received dummy shots. That worked out to a 31 percent lower risk of infection for the vaccine group.

And it makes me wonder - what is statistical significance of this diference? What is a confidence level that those that were given vaccine were in fact more immune? Or in other words - what is a confidence level that probability of contracting AIDS was lower in those that received vaccine? (Sure, we have to assume both group were otherwise identical).

In theory I should know how to calculate it, but after 20 years of lying somewhere in the dark corner my statistics is so rusty I prefer not to touch it, as it may fall apart
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two groups: control vs. experiment.

If a group consists of N total individuals, n of whom were infected, then each individual within that group can be modeled as a Bernoulli trial with mean p = n/N and variance = p(1-p). A Bernoulli trial is an individual "experiment" with probability p of getting infected.

N trials are distributed Binomial with mean = Np = n and variance = Np(1-p) for the group as a whole.

Control group (m = 74, M = 8198):
...For an individual:
...Bernoulli probability: p = m/M = 0.00902659
...For the group:
...Binomial mean: m = 74
...Binomial variance: u = Mp(1-p) = 73.332.
Experiment group (n = 51, N = 8197)
...For an individual:
...Bernoulli probability: q = n/N = 0.00622179
...For the group:
...Binomial mean: n = 51
...Binomial variance: v = Nq(1-q) = 50.6827.

Unequal variances t-test:
...s = Sqrt[(Nu+Mv)/(MN)] = 0.122997
...t = (m - n)/s = 186.997
...d.f. = (u/M + v/N)^2 / ((u/M)^2/(M - 1) + (v/N)^2/(N - 1)) = 15,864.5
...The null hypothesis "true m = true n" can be rejected at a very high degree of statistical significance.

Equal variance t-test:
...S = Sqrt[((M-1)u+(N-1)v)/(M+N-2)] = 7.8745
...s = S Sqrt[1/M + 1/N] = 0.122998
...t = (m - n)/s = 186.995
...d.f. = M + N - 2 = 16,393
...Again, the null hypothesis "true m = true n" can be rejected at a very high degree of statistical significance.
 
Last edited:
Many thanks.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
100
Views
9K
Replies
42
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
201
Views
20K
Replies
516
Views
35K
Replies
287
Views
25K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top