Am I doing this correctly? (s domain analysis)

  • Thread starter Thread starter seang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Domain
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the analysis of a circuit in the s domain following the opening of a switch at time t = 0. Participants are exploring the transformation of the circuit, the determination of initial conditions, and the subsequent calculations for the current in both the s domain and time domain.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their approach to finding the initial current using the circuit before the switch is opened and applying superposition.
  • Another participant challenges the initial current calculation, asserting that the inductor acts as a short circuit in steady state, leading to a different expression for the initial current.
  • A participant questions the customary practice of finding initial conditions before transforming to the s domain and discusses the impedance of the inductor in the s domain.
  • Another participant confirms the need to find initial conditions before the s domain transformation and provides an equation in the s domain, asserting that the impedance of the inductor is sL.
  • A participant outlines their steps for manipulating the equations to isolate I(s), seeking confirmation on their approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the calculation of initial conditions and the sequence of transformations, indicating that multiple competing views remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants' statements depend on assumptions about circuit behavior in steady state and the definitions of initial conditions, which are not universally agreed upon in this discussion.

seang
Messages
184
Reaction score
0
The switch in the following circuit has been close for a long time and is opened at t = 0. Transform the circuit into the s doman and solve for Isubl(s) and Isubl(t) in symbolic form.

I've only found Isubl(s) so far, and I want to see how I'm doing before I convert it back to the time domain. I hope my work is clear; I used the t < 0 circuit to find out the inductors initial current, then used superposition to find the final current.

How am I doing? Thanks a lot.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled-1.jpg
    Untitled-1.jpg
    58.6 KB · Views: 432
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think you found the intial current incorrectly. Since the switched has been closed for a long time, then we can safely assume that the circuit is in steady state. This means that the inductor is acts like a perfect conductor or simply a wire. Then the intial current is actually

[tex]I_0 = \frac {V_a}{R}[/tex]
 
Ok, so is it customary to find hte IC before converting the circuit to the s domain? Because I intuitively knew that an inductor was a short circuit in a DC setting, but regardless, its impedance in the s domain is Ls, right? How does this work?

EDIT: I guess it shouldn't matter, right?

So the formula you presented is in the time domain, right?
its s domain equivalent would be

[tex]I_0(s) = \frac {V_a}{sR}[/tex]

yay?
 
Last edited:
Yes you need to find the intial conditions before transforming the circuit into the s domain. The equation I wrote is in s domain already. No need to modify it. The battery that is introduced in the s domain should be

[tex]LI_0 = L \frac {Va}{R}[/tex]

The impedance of the inductor in the s domain is indeed sL.

After you transform the circuit into the s domain, write a KVL to obtain

[tex]\frac {Va}{s} + 2R I(s) + sL I(s) + L \frac {Va}{R} = 0[/tex]
 
So I factor, move the I(s) term over, then divide, is this correct?[tex]\frac{VaR}{sR} + \frac{SLVa}{sR} = -I(s)(2R + sL)I(s) = \frac{-Va}{R} \ast \frac{(R + sL)}{s(2R + sL)}[/tex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K