Am I to the end of this Boolean Algebra Problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around simplifying a Boolean algebra expression, initially presented as a combination of terms. The user successfully reduced it to three terms but faced challenges in further simplification. After using a Karnaugh map, they initially arrived at different results but later corrected their error, aligning with another user's findings. The consensus is that for problems with up to four inputs, a Karnaugh map is the most effective tool for simplification. The user expresses confidence in their understanding of the math but seeks a more concise form for practical purposes.
Caponae
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Here's the problem:

a'b'c'd' + a'b'cd' + a'b'cd + ab'c'd' + abc'd'

I've gotten it down to:
ac'd' + b'c'd' + a'b'c

Having trouble coming up with a way to simplify it more...Is this as far as it can go?
Any help appreciated, thanks...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I did a quick K-map, and got it down to 3 terms, but my terms are different from yours. I got 2 3-terms and one 4-term.

Did you use a Karnaugh map? Where did the ac'd' term come from, for example?
 
I used Boolean Algebra Axioms that I had learned in college to simplify it to the result that I got...

The lines are on the board at work, I'll try to update this thread with them tomorrow from work...

Thanks for the response...
 
berkeman said:
I did a quick K-map, and got it down to 3 terms, but my terms are different from yours. I got 2 3-terms and one 4-term.

Did you use a Karnaugh map? Where did the ac'd' term come from, for example?
I found an error in my quick K-map. I now get the same answer as you. For problems like this with up to 4 inputs, the K-map is the easiest way to see what the simplest answer is. Well, assuming you don't make an error like I did yesterday :blushing:
 
no problem...it happens...thanks for the update...i feel confident about the math, i just wanted it smaller to help out in a query that i was writing...
 

Similar threads

Back
Top