Ambiguity in the Arc-Tangent Function

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bw0young0math
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the ambiguity in the arc-tangent function, specifically the differences between arctan(5/-5) and arctan(-5/5). Both expressions yield the same numerical result due to the periodic nature of the tangent function, which has a period of π, not 2π. The confusion arises because calculators may not return the correct quadrant for the inverse tangent. The atan2 function in programming languages resolves this by taking two arguments to determine the correct quadrant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis concepts
  • Familiarity with the tangent function and its periodicity
  • Knowledge of inverse trigonometric functions
  • Basic understanding of polar coordinates and their relationship to rectangular coordinates
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implementation and usage of the atan2 function in programming languages
  • Explore the properties of the tangent function and its inverse in detail
  • Learn about converting between rectangular and polar coordinates
  • Investigate the implications of quadrant determination in trigonometric functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, computer programmers, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of trigonometric functions and their applications in various fields.

bw0young0math
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
This problem is about complex analysis.
Why arctan(5/-5) is different from arctan-1(-5/5)?
tan-1(5/-5)=3ㅠ/4 +2kㅠ
tan-1(-5/5)=-1ㅠ/4+2kㅠ (k :arbtrary integer.)

Why can't I calculate just arctan(-1)?I thought that it is related withe tangent peoriod ㅠ not 2ㅠ.
However I can't know that exactly.
Please help me...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: Ambiguity in the Arc Tangent Function

You are correct in that the problem arises from the tangent function having period $\pi$ and not $2\pi$. Because of that, your calculator may not give you the correct quadrant when it computes the inverse (arctan). You have to think to yourself, "Hmm. My $x$ is positive, so I have to be in either the first or the fourth quadrant. $y$ is negative; therefore, I must be in the fourth quadrant." Actually, if you ask your calculator to compute
$$\arctan(-5/5)\quad \text{and} \quad \arctan(5/(-5)),$$
it will give you the same result both times. One of them is in error, however. Some programming languages get around this by implementing the atan2 function, which takes two arguments and returns the correct quadrant.
 
Re: Ambiguity in the Arc Tangent Function

Ackbach said:
$$\arctan(-5/5)\quad \text{and} \quad \arctan(5/(-5)),$$
it will give you the same result both times. One of them is in error, however. Some programming languages get around this by implementing the atan2 function, which takes two arguments and returns the correct quadrant.

At first, thanks for your help. :o
I understood your meaning that they have same values consequently. Right?
However, arctan(5/(-5)) can't express -ㅠ/4. Thus I can't understand why they are the same.Also,you mentioned about x, y, and quadrant.
My friend and I thought the reason arctan(5/(-5)) and arctan((-5)/5) are different as discussing x,y,and quadrant also.
However we didn't know why we put one of x and y denominator or numerator. Could you explain this?
 
Re: Ambiguity in the Arc Tangent Function

bw0young0math said:
At first, thanks for your help. :o
I understood your meaning that they have same values consequently. Right?
However, arctan(5/(-5)) can't express -ㅠ/4. Thus I can't understand why they are the same.

It's essentially an order of operations problem. As it happens, $-5/5=5/(-5)=-1$, so the argument to the arctan function is the same in both cases.

Also,you mentioned about x, y, and quadrant.
My friend and I thought the reason arctan(5/(-5)) and arctan((-5)/5) are different as discussing x,y,and quadrant also.
However we didn't know why we put one of x and y denominator or numerator. Could you explain this?

This arises when you are attempting to find the magnitude and direction of a 2D vector from its components. Equivalently, you are converting from rectangular coordinates to polar, either with real number or with the complex numbers.

The forward direction is
\begin{align*}
x&=r \cos( \theta)\\
y&=r \sin( \theta).
\end{align*}
If you divide the second of these by the first, you get
$$ \frac{y}{x}= \tan( \theta).$$
Taking the arctangent of both sides yields the usual equation
$$ \theta= \arctan \left( \frac{y}{x} \right).$$
So the reason $y$ is in the numerator, is because this is the correct transformation from rectangular coordinates to polar.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K