Biology Ames Test: Understanding Mutations and Lethality

  • Thread starter Thread starter hidemi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Test
AI Thread Summary
The Ames test is primarily designed to detect mutations rather than lethality at high concentrations of compounds. It identifies mutations in specific genes using specially engineered strains that can survive only if a mutation occurs, with more colonies indicating more mutations. While the test focuses on mutagenic compounds, a lethal compound would also impact the assay results. The discussion confirms that the Ames test is not mutagenic itself and emphasizes the distinction between mutation detection and lethality. Overall, the Ames test serves as a valuable tool for assessing mutagenicity in substances.
hidemi
Messages
206
Reaction score
36
Homework Statement
In the Ames, the clear region of no growth near the center of the plate (where the compound of interest is placed) typically indicates that the compound is:
A) not mutagenic
B) an antibiotic
C) an amino acid
D0 lethat at high enough concertrations
E) not taken up by bacteria

The correct answer is D.
Relevant Equations
None
From my understanding, Ames test is the test for mutation, not lethality at high enough concentration. Let me know if my understanding is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It detects mutations in particular genes using special strains made to survive when a mutation is made.
More colonies, more mutations.

There are lots of genetic tests and techniques, that use similar strategies, to quickly and easily show when a mutation has been made, so you can easily count them.
 
Last edited:
From my understanding, Ames test is the test for mutation, not lethality at high enough concentration. Let me know if my understanding is wrong.
 
It is not mutagenic (A).
If it made mutations, then some of the mutations would be able to survive where the compound was at high concentration.
No mutations, no survivors.
 
The test is meant to detect mutagenic compounds, but a compound that is lethal to the bacteria would also have a detectable effect on the assay.

In the case of the question, I would think that (B) and (D) are both reasonable answers to the question.
 
Thank you all! I understand!
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top