Amount of photons released during decrease of energy of vibration

AI Thread Summary
An atom's energy of vibration is expressed as E=nhv, where n represents whole numbers. When an atom transitions from a higher energy state (6hv) to a lower state (2hv), it releases 4hv of energy, which can be associated with photon emission. However, a single photon is emitted during this transition, regardless of the energy difference, as the energy of one photon is hv. The discussion clarifies that while multiple electrons can exist in an atom, they do not all emit photons simultaneously, and the emission can occur in one or multiple steps. The energy associated with atomic oscillation does not represent the total energy of the atom but rather a component of its overall energy.
mcfaker
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
An atom has the following energy of vibration: E= nhv. n can only be in the range of whole numbers.

So if an vibrating atom changed energy, say from 6hv to 2hv, it means that 4hv of energy is released in light/photons

Does that mean that 4 photons are "released" by the atom (?), because The energy of one photon is equal to hv ?


Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, single photon is emitted. It just has different ν.
 
But an atom can have several electrons, each electron emitts just one photon. So if 4hv energy is emitted, there must be 4 photons emitted because the energy of 1 photon is hv.
It can't be that an atom that emitts 2hv, or 4hv of energy, only emitts 1 photon?
 
You are apparently mixing things and TBH I have no idea what where to start, as it is not clear what misconceptions are behind your reasoning.

Atoms don't vibrate - vibrations are characteristic of molecules, at least diatomic. Quantum oscillator energy is given as E_n=(n+\frac 1 2)\hbar \omega.

Single electron transition (which has nothing to do with oscillations) emits a single photon of some characteristic energy.

You can convert this energy to the photon frequency, but it is not that all photons in the whole universe have the same frequency ν and the same energy hν.

Just because atom has several electrons doesn't mean they all get excited at the same time.

When the oscillator falls from an excited stated to the more basic one it can do it in one large step (emitting k\hbar\omega energy) or in k steps, emitting \hbar\omega in each. But it has nothing to do with electrons.
 
Thanks, does oscillation energy of an atom represent the total energy of an atom? or is it just partial energy?
I know that atoms have internal potential energy& kinetic energy.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top