Amplification Cycles and Cycles of PCR

AI Thread Summary
A sample undergoing 35 amplification cycles will produce 1,073,741,824 copies of the target sequence after 30 cycles of PCR, assuming 100% efficiency. Amplification cycles and cycles of PCR are considered synonymous in this context. The calculation used is correct, utilizing the formula 2^n. Clarification was provided regarding the terminology, leading to a better understanding of the concepts. The discussion concludes with the participant expressing gratitude for the clarification.
ver_mathstats
Messages
258
Reaction score
21

Homework Statement


A sample undergoes 35 amplification cycles. How many copies of the target sequence has been produced after 30 cycles of PCR?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


2n=230=1073741824
Is this correct?
Im just a little confused as to what the difference is between amplification cycle and cycles of PCR?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ver_mathstats said:

Homework Statement


A sample undergoes 35 amplification cycles. How many copies of the target sequence has been produced after 30 cycles of PCR?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


2n=230=1073741824
Is this correct?
Im just a little confused as to what the difference is between amplification cycle and cycles of PCR?

Thank you.

Yes, that answer looks correct (assuming 100% efficiency). Amplification cycles and cycles of PCR are synonymous in this case.
 
Ygggdrasil said:
Yes, that answer looks correct (assuming 100% efficiency). Amplification cycles and cycles of PCR are synonymous in this case.
Okay thank you I understand.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top