An approximate solution to the Van der Pauw equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter smithg86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approximate
smithg86
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


question: approximate the function f if the ratio R_1 / R_2 is about 1000.

given:
the van der pauw equation for resistivity:
\rho = ( pi * d / ln[2] ) * (R_1 + R_2})/2 * f(R_1 / R_2),

where f is a function of the ratio R_1/R_2 only and satisfies the relation:

(R_1- R_2)/(R_1+R_2) = f arccosh{exp(ln[2]/f) / 2}.

from van der pauw's 1958 paper:if R_1 and R_2 are almost equal, f can be approximated by the formula

f ~ 1 - [ (R_1 - R_2) / (R_1 + R_2) ]^2 * ln[2] / 2 - [(R_1 - R_2)/(R_1 + R_2)]^4 * {(ln[2])^2 / 4 - (ln[2])^3 / 12}.

Homework Equations


-

The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea how to start this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
smithg86 said:
from van der pauw's 1958 paper: if R_1 and R_2 are almost equal[/color], f can be approximated by the formula

f ~ 1 - [ (R_1 - R_2) / (R_1 + R_2) ]^2 * ln[2] / 2 - [(R_1 - R_2)/(R_1 + R_2)]^4 * {(ln[2])^2 / 4 - (ln[2])^3 / 12}.

That approximation doesn't seem like it would be very accurate when R_1=1000R_2!:wink:


I have no idea how to start this.

What does \frac{R_1-R_2}{R_1+R_2} equal when \frac{R_1}{R_2}=1000?
 
What does \frac{R_1-R_2}{R_1+R_2} equal when \frac{R_1}{R_2}=1000?[/QUOTE]

It's 999/1001. But I don't know how to apply that to find an approximate solution. How do you go about finding an approximate solution to that, or any other function?
 
I can't seem to solve the equation explicitly for f (I think it's transcendental). Can I still use the Taylor series method?
 
Yes, it is transcendental, but I think you can still use a Taylor series. However, at the moment I can't think of exactly what expression your going to want to expand to make things easiest...I'll give it some more thought in the morning, but in the meantime hopefully someone else will jump in.
 
##|\Psi|^2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\exp(\frac{-(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##\braket{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,x\exp(-\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##y=x-x_0 \quad x=y+x_0 \quad dy=dx.## The boundaries remain infinite, I believe. ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dy(y+x_0)\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2}).## ##\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,y\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2})+\frac{2x_0}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,\exp(-\frac{y^2}{b^2}).## I then resolved the two...
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top