An experiment on magnetism and momentum?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of magnetism and momentum, specifically exploring a hypothetical scenario involving two electromagnets and the implications of their magnetic fields on motion and conservation laws. Participants examine the potential for a "reactionless drive" based on the interaction of these fields over a distance, raising questions about the nature of electromagnetic momentum and conservation of momentum in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a scenario where two electromagnets, A and B, are a light year apart, and discusses how their magnetic fields could interact to create forces that seem to violate Newton's third law.
  • Another participant questions the validity of the scenario, suggesting that the intermediate states of the magnetic fields would interact in ways that complicate the proposed mechanism.
  • A different participant suggests that the conservation of momentum is maintained because the electromagnetic field itself carries momentum, and compares this to the momentum of photons generated by electromagnetic waves.
  • Some participants argue that the Lorentz force involved in the system could be significantly larger than the momentum carried by photons, depending on the field strength and current.
  • One participant emphasizes that the momentum of electromagnetic fields is dependent on the square of the field strength and is independent of polarity, challenging the initial premise of the proposed drive.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about why the proposed system would not violate conservation of momentum and references related concepts in electrohydrodynamics.
  • One participant reiterates the idea of a reactionless drive, detailing steps for how the magnetic fields could be manipulated to create forces in the same direction, while also discussing the momentum density of the electromagnetic field.
  • Another participant asserts that electromagnetic fields possess their own momentum, referencing historical work by Maxwell to support this claim.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the proposed scenario violates conservation of momentum. There are multiple competing views regarding the interaction of the magnetic fields and the implications for momentum conservation.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the behavior of electromagnetic fields and their interactions, which may not be fully resolved. The dependence on definitions of momentum and the effects of field strength and distance are also noted as potential limitations in the arguments presented.

enroger
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Say we have two electromagnet A and B a light year apart from each other. Someone turn on A and a magnetic field is created and propagate at c toward B.

It takes a year for the mag field from A to arrive B, B is turned on just before A's field arrive. B's field made to be opposite from A and is then repelled by the A's field.

But since information can not travel faster than c, when B start accelerating A would not know. It takes a year for A to notice B's field.

Ordinarily, if A's magnetic field remains unchanged when B's field arrive, A would experience a repulsion force and accelerate to the other direction in comply with conservation of momentum.

But what if A change it's magnetic field just before B's field arrive? Then when B's field arrive A would feel an attraction force! This makes both A and B feel a force to the same direction resulting in a serious violation to Newton's third law.

This could be used to build a reactionless drive:
step 1: A turn on, mag field out
step 2: just before A's mag field arrive, B turn on with a opposite field direction from A so B gets repelled. And B's mag field travel to A too.
step 3: just before B's mag field reach A, A reverse current direction to reverse field direction=> A is attracted to B when the field arrive.
... get the picture?

as long as A & B switch field direction exactly out of phase, all the force acting on them are of the same direction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:rolleyes:

i don't know... and what about the intermediate states?? the two fields will interact in some spacetime point in the middle... and the strenghts vary in function of the relative distances...

ummmhhh..
 
I don't know the detailed explanation why this system does not violate conservation of momentum. Probably it has something to do with the fact, that electromagnetic field has it's own momentum, so the magnets+field momentum is conserved.
A similar "reactionless drive" can be achieved simply by turning on a lamp on the "vehicle": each foton with energy E also carries a small momentum E/c, so any source of electro-magnetic waves can be used for propulsion.
 
Sorry, double post.
 
I don't think this kind of momentum can be compared to the momentum of photons, since the force is actually lorenz force here which can be many magnitude larger than photon's force depends of field strength and current.

Also, the distance can be 3 meter with magnetic fields of the two solenoids oscillate at 100Mhz.
 
enroger said:
I don't think this kind of momentum can be compared to the momentum of photons, since the force is actually lorenz force here which can be many magnitude larger than photon's force depends of field strength and current.

My dear friend, photons are the smallest quantity of electromagnetic field in excistence, so the momentum of photons *is* very significant here. It is simply a matter of having enough of them.

The concept fails because this momentum depends on the *square* of the field - hence, it is independent of the polarity, and is determined by the propagation vector of the electromagnetic wave. Changeing the current in the loop does not change the propagation of the wave, it only puts it out of phase by a half wave.
 
no one has actually said why this wouldn't work? At least, not a plausible complete explanation? I've heard something related to this concerning electro hydrodynamics? I don't know maybe.

So, why would the original question NOT violate conservation of momentum??
 
enroger said:
This could be used to build a reactionless drive:
step 1: A turn on, mag field out
step 2: just before A's mag field arrive, B turn on with a opposite field direction from A so B gets repelled. And B's mag field travel to A too.
step 3: just before B's mag field reach A, A reverse current direction to reverse field direction=> A is attracted to B when the field arrive.
... get the picture?

as long as A & B switch field direction exactly out of phase, all the force acting on them are of the same direction.

In Step 1 the magnetic field of A varies in time, and is therefore accompanied by an electric field. The time-varying electric field in turn induces a magnetic field further out in space. (This is how A's magnetic field propagates out into space.) The momentum density of the electromagnetic field is proportional to E X B. Thus as the fields of A propagate out into space they engender momentum. Etc. I am confident that momentum is conserved throughout a cycle of your system when the momentum of ALL things is considered.
 
Lojzek said:
electromagnetic field has it's own momentum

This is the correct answer.

In fact, Maxwell deduced the existence of electromagnetic momentum because it was necessary to explain this very problem.
The magnetic field behaves exactly as does an ordinary object with energy and momentum.

You can find his original treatise here if you're interested.
http://www.archive.org/stream/treatiseonelectr01maxwrich#page/n5/mode/2up"
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K