An increase of $0,15 on a price of 2,50 is an increse by a fraction

  • Thread starter Thread starter rkm-87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction increase
AI Thread Summary
An increase of $0.15 on a price of $2.50 represents a 6% increase, calculated as 0.15 divided by 2.50. The numerator is the increase amount, which allows for comparison to the original price. Understanding percentages involves expressing a fraction with a denominator of 100, making it easier to compare values. The discussion also highlights how to evaluate price differences between products by normalizing costs to a common unit, such as per liter or per $100. Overall, grasping these concepts aids in making informed financial decisions.
rkm-87
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
an increase of $0,15 on a price of 2,50 is an increse by a fraction of 0.15/2.50=0,06

expressed as a percentage,therefore a 6% increase


I don,t understand this

and why we put 0.15 is numerator
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Decide which culture you are expressing; either a comma for whole-fraction separation, or a period, dot for whole-fraction separation. Let's use the dot, or "decimal point".

You can compare the size of price increase to the original or starting price. This comparison can be expressed as a fraction. You put the 0.15 in the numerator because you are looking at how large is the increase compared to the original; otherwise, you could compare the original price to the price increase by putting the 2.50 in the numerator.

What fraction of the original is the increase? 0.15/2.50
What fraction of the increase is the original? 2.50/0.15

Obviously, in the second case, the fraction is actually larger than 1. [two and a half over fifteen hundredths]
 
you mean that percentage is change over the whole
 
I have problem with concept of percentage

I don't understand it clearly

please help me

please
 
rkm-87 said:
I have problem with concept of percentage

I don't understand it clearly

please help me

please

Percentage is the numerator corresponding to a denominator of 100.
0.06 = 6/100 = 6 %, meaning six percent.
 
Or, if you would normalize it to 100, how much it would become. This allows for easy comparison.

Compare it to this example: brand A comes in 50 cl bottles and costs $ 0.60, brand B costs $ 0.45 but it only comes in 33 cl bottles, which one is a better buy?
One way (the most common, I think) to see this is by converting both quantities to the 1 liter price. I need to bottles of A to make a liter, so A costs $ 1.20 for a liter, while B costs $ 0.45 * (100 / 33) \approx $ 1.36 per liter. So though A is more expensive, it is cheaper in comparison with B.

Now take this example: in one store the salesman gives me a $ 200 discount on a TV which would normally cost $ 1500, in another store I find a cheaper TV of $ 1300 but I only get $ 125 discount. In which store will I relatively save the most money? Again, we normalize the price of a TV to $ 100. Dividing the price and the discount by 15 on both sides, I would get about $ 13.33 off at one, and (divide by 13) $9.62 at B, if the TV would cost $100. In other words, for each $100 dollar I would spend on the TV, I would get $13.33 discount at one store, and $9.62 at the other one. This is what we mean by saying "I get a 13.33% discount at one store, and 9.62% at the other" (x % being: x on every 100).
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top