An infinite series transformed from Laplace transform

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around transforming the Laplace transform into an infinite series using integration by parts. The resulting series may not have a specific name and is described as a Laplace transform series or simply an infinite series. The mathematical expressions presented illustrate the relationship between the Laplace transform and the infinite series derived from it. Ultimately, the conclusion reached is that this transformation results in an unnamed infinite series. The transformation process and its implications are central to the conversation.
SAT999
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hello. I have transformed the Laplace transform into the infinite series by repeatedly using integration by parts.
What is this infinite series? may be Laplace transform series, or only an infinite series without name?

<br /> L(t)= \int_{t}^{\infty}\frac{f(t)}{e^{st}} dt =-0 + <br /> <br /> \frac{1}{e^{st}}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{f^{(n)}(t)}{s^{(n+1)}} <br />

<br /> <br /> IL(L(t))= \frac{1}{2\Pi i}\int_{\gamma-i\infty}^{\gamma+i\infty}e^{st}L(t) ds=\frac{1}{2\Pi <br /> <br /> i}\oint_{c}e^{st}L(t) ds = \frac{1}{2\Pi i}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\oint_{c}\frac{f^{(n)}(t)}{s^{(n+1)}} <br /> <br /> ds<br />

<br /> = \frac{1}{2\Pi i}f(t)\oint_{c}\frac{1}{s} ds = \frac{1}{2\Pi i}f(t)\int_{0}^{2\Pi}\frac{is}{s} <br /> <br /> d\Theta = f(t)<br />
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm not quite sure what you have done there, but the answer is: just another infinite series without name.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top