An Interesting Complex Number Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a complex number problem from the 2013 Panhellenic exams, which is considered particularly challenging. The problem involves proving that for certain complex numbers, the inequality |v| < 4 holds true. The initial steps involve solving a complex equation that defines a circle, but the subsequent inequality requires deeper understanding within the complex number system. Concerns are raised about the overall difficulty of the exam, which includes multiple challenging problems to solve within a limited time. The thread invites opinions on the problem's complexity and the exam's structure.
Mkbul
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hey all.

I am giving Panhellenic exams this year, and part of my preparation comes from solving previous' years questions. This problem was a complex number based one, in the 2013 Panhellenic exams. It goes as follows:

Consider 3 complex numbers, α01 and α2 which belong in the line given by the following equation:
(α-2)(α'-2)+|α-2|=2 , where α∈ℂ and α' is α's conjugate

If complex number v satisfies the following expression:

v32v21v+α0=0 , Prove that:

|v|<4

It is said that it was the hardest complex number problem they ever put in the exam, and it was totally against exam "spirit". By the way the exams are done in the last year of Senior High School.

I really want to hear your opinions on the matter. Thanks for reading.
Michael.

EDIT: I apologize if this is the wrong forum for this question. I've been a member for quite a while now but i haven't visited in many years. I didn't post this problem here to get it solved. I just wanted people to discuss it and give their thoughts about the exams. If i broke any guidelines please move my thread, i didn't mean to cause harm.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't think it is that hard. You have to find the points that satisfy the first equation, then the rest is a simple inequality in the real numbers. There is also a theorem that gives a slightly weaker (but still sufficient) result compared to the inequality.
 
mfb said:
I don't think it is that hard. You have to find the points that satisfy the first equation, then the rest is a simple inequality in the real numbers.

Thanks for the reply, mfb. I did the first step and solved the complex equation, and the points that satisfy it belong in a circle with center K(2,0) and radius r=1.
Unfortunately that was the easy part. The inequality is not in the real numbers but in the complex number system. V a0, a1 and a2 are all complex numbers. I will try to solve this one now.

What worries me is that this was only one exercise, and the exam had 4. The proof of the fundamental theorem of calculus, this one, and two calculus problems with fuction-integrals. It seems quite a lot to solve in 3 hours.

By the way, i love your avatar. Isn't this an artists concept of that newly discovered planet with a massive ring system?
 
Mkbul said:
Thanks for the reply, mfb. I did the first step and solved the complex equation, and the points that satisfy it belong in a circle with center K(2,0) and radius r=1.
Right.
Mkbul said:
Unfortunately that was the easy part. The inequality is not in the real numbers but in the complex number system. V a0, a1 and a2 are all complex numbers.
Sure, but it is sufficient to consider their magnitude. For large v, the first term is very large - |v3| is at least 64 in the region where you have to exclude zeros...
Mkbul said:
By the way, i love your avatar. Isn't this an artists concept of that newly discovered planet with a massive ring system?
Yes it is :). I scaled it a bit to fit.
 
  • Like
Likes Mkbul
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top