An interferometer with two arms is constructed above

  • Thread starter Thread starter fobbz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interferometer
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the functioning of an interferometer with two arms, focusing on the behavior of wavelengths in vacuum chambers. It is clarified that while each chamber receives half the total light, the number of wavelengths passing through remains unchanged over time. The user seeks to understand the relationship between wavelength and frequency, leading to the calculation that a 1 cm evacuated tube contains approximately 20,000 wavelengths. When transitioning from constructive to destructive interference, it is noted that this results in an additional half wavelength, leading to a total of 20,000.5 wavelengths. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding refractive index changes in determining the nature of interference.
fobbz
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I have attached the problem as the image is needed for the question.

a) Basically, from what I understand the wave is being split, thus each chamber receives the total number of wavelengths/2. The chambers, however are vacuums, so the number of wavelengths passing in doesn't change right?
Looking at my formulae for interferometers for destructive and constructive interference I cannot see one that would contribute to solving this part of the problem?

my formulae: L=m\lambda/2 constructive interference, L=(m+.5)\lambda/2 for destructive interference.

b) I need a to find this part I believe.

c) Need b.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2013-04-12 at 8.15.49 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2013-04-12 at 8.15.49 PM.png
    20.5 KB · Views: 573
Physics news on Phys.org
fobbz said:
the wave is being split, thus each chamber receives the total number of wavelengths/2.
It doesn't mean anything to say that each receives some number of wavelengths. Each receives half the total light.
The chambers, however are vacuums, so the number of wavelengths passing in doesn't change right?
Do you mean, the number of waves entering in a given interval of time doesn't change? That would be true. "Wavelengths" are lengths - they don't enter anything.
Looking at my formulae for interferometers for destructive and constructive interference I cannot see one that would contribute to solving this part of the problem?
5a is not a question about interference. It just asks how many wavelengths long would a 1cm evacuated tube be if the light has the given frequency. What formula do you know relating wavelength to frequency?
 
well v=fλ. So if the wavelength is λ=c/f=(3E8 m/s) /(6E14 m) , λ=5E-7 m

So in 1 cm, 1 cm / 5E-7 = 20 000 wavelengths?

Okay that makes sense...

b) So next if the maxima changes to a minima, that means that an extra half wavelength is now being sent out making it destructive? So there would be 20 000.5 wavelengths?
 
fobbz said:
an extra half wavelength is now being sent out making it destructive? So there would be 20 000.5 wavelengths?
Wavelengths are not "sent out". Waves are sent out, and the number sent out depends on the frequency and the time period. What you mean is that the 1cm tube now represents 20000.5 wavelengths. (Or could it be 19999.5? How do you know which it is?)
 
I know it is 20 000.5 because what changed was only the refractive index - the m order value did not change. So because it's now a minimum, (m+1/2) wavelengths would appear?
 
fobbz said:
I know it is 20 000.5 because what changed was only the refractive index - the m order value did not change. So because it's now a minimum, (m+1/2) wavelengths would appear?
You know it changed by half a wavelength. It is not instantly clear whether it increased or decreased by half a wavelength. But suppose it has increased. What is the refractive index?
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Back
Top