Analog of Hawking Radiation Observed?

In summary, a new paper discusses the possibility of creating a "white hole" using analog gravity in a lab setting. Some believe this may be comparable to astrophysical Hawking radiation, but there are doubts due to the lack of a thermal distribution in the observed spectrum. Another paper expands on the similarities between these systems and black hole event horizons. The discussion also includes a critique of the experimental paper and some humorous comments.
  • #1
Phyisab****
586
2
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Wow! Interesting, even it is not a "real" horizon
 
  • #3
That's pretty cool.
 
  • #4
Anyone have an opinion on how well this parallels astrophysical Hawking radiation?
 
  • #5
Phyisab**** said:
Anyone have an opinion on how well this parallels astrophysical Hawking radiation?
As far as I can see, the measured spectrum does not have a thermal distribution, while true Hawking radiation should.
From their analysis, it is not clear at all (at least to me) that observed radiation is really the Hawking radiation.
 
  • #6
The arXiv blog has a post about it http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/25805/

The subsequent comments aren't particularly enlightening but are mildly amusing (particularly the one that suggests curtains satisfy the definition of a "white hole" :) )
 
  • #7
This ref

http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.4150"

contains more details on how the physics of these systems is similar to that of a BH event horizon.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #8
sheaf said:
This ref

http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.4150"

contains more details on how the physics of these systems is similar to that of a BH event horizon.
Seems much more interesting than the experimental paper we discussed so far. Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. What is analog Hawking radiation?

Analog Hawking radiation is a phenomenon that occurs in certain systems, such as Bose-Einstein condensates or flowing fluids, that mimic the behavior of black holes. It is a type of radiation that is predicted to be emitted from black holes due to quantum effects, but has not yet been directly observed in black holes themselves.

2. How was analog Hawking radiation observed?

Scientists used an experimental setup with a fluid flowing through a narrow channel, creating a simulated black hole. They were able to measure the acoustic waves within the fluid, which behaved similarly to the predicted behavior of Hawking radiation.

3. What is the significance of this observation?

This observation provides strong evidence for the existence of Hawking radiation and supports the theory of black hole evaporation. It also opens up new possibilities for studying and understanding the behavior of black holes and other systems that exhibit similar phenomena.

4. Can this observation be applied to real black holes?

While the observed analog of Hawking radiation is not exactly the same as the predicted radiation from black holes, it does provide valuable insights and could potentially lead to new methods for studying real black holes.

5. What further research is needed in this area?

Further research is needed to better understand the connection between analog Hawking radiation and the radiation emitted by real black holes. Additionally, more experiments and observations are needed to confirm and refine the current findings.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
772
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
188
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
28
Views
3K
Back
Top