: Analysis 2 Textbook recommendations please?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SMHPhysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Textbook
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around finding a suitable real analysis textbook for self-study, particularly for someone with a mathematical background that includes Spivak's Calculus and other foundational texts. The individual is looking for a book that is more advanced than Spivak's Calculus and seeks recommendations for texts that cover multivariable analysis and topics like Stokes' theorem and manifolds. Munkres' Analysis on Manifolds is highlighted as a user-friendly option that provides detailed explanations, making it a strong candidate. Rudin's Principles of Mathematical Analysis is suggested as a foundational text that could prepare the individual for more advanced studies. Pugh's Analysis is noted for its brevity in covering multivariable calculus, which may not meet the individual's needs as thoroughly as Munkres. Additional recommendations include Hubbard's Vector Calculus, Linear Algebra, and Differential Forms, Edwards' Advanced Calculus of Several Variables, and Fleming's Functions of Several Variables, all of which could complement the individual's studies.
SMHPhysics
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello,

My father will be visiting the UK soon. I live in a developing country where not many books are available, so he'll be bringing them here. Now, I have already compiled a list of quite a few books. I am particularly looking forward to Munkres' Topology and Sutherland's Metric Spaces and Topology. However I need a real analysis book, at a level higher that Spivak's Calculus textbook, which I have completed. My 'mathematical maturity' is at the level of Spivak's Calculus, Shilov's linear algebra, Tennenbaum's differential equations, and parts of Apostol's Analysis, etc. I have already had cookbook James Stewart style non rigorous calculus course. I know its not much but I've turned 18 not long ago, and I haven't started college yet (begins fall 2013 I hope).

I would prefer something at the level of Spivak's calculus on manifolds, but its very terse I've noticed from Amazon. What about Munkres' Analysis on Manifolds? Ideally one of these two should do, but I would like to know which would be more appropriate, given that I will be mostly using them for self-study? Also is Pugh's Analysis similar to either of these? The book for me should cover multivariable analysis, with a proof of Stoke's theorem, manifolds etc. Throw in any other suggestions you like! :)

Professor Mathwonk, if you're here Sir, I'm really looking forward to your post :)

Thank You!

PS: PLEASE DO NOT HIJACK THIS THREAD!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Spivak's Calculus is not quite at the level of introductory real analysis, so moving to a second course in real analysis would be quite a jump. If I were you, I would first learn single variable analysis. Rudin's Principles of Mathematical Analysis essentially boils Spivak's Calculus down to 170 short pages and examines everything from a more general and comprehensive point of view. It should definitely be accessible to you.

After that you will certainly be much more prepared to tackle Spivak's Calculus on Manifolds. Munkres' Analysis book will take you to the same place but with much more words.
 
I own/have access to all three books you mentioned but unfortunately since we only recently got to differential forms in my analysis class, I haven't read them in detail. You are right in that Spivak seems terse although people say if you work out the exercises you'll be golden. As for Pugh, I like his style but keep in mind that he only devotes one out of the 6 chapters in his book to multivariable calculus so his whole treatment is around 50-60 pages long. I would say Munkres would be the most detailed and user-friendly as he motivates things quite well and breaks long up proofs into steps and stuff like that. So if you had to choose one, I'd go for Munkres.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
482
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Back
Top