Analysis: Derivatives, Rolle's Theorem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a property of a function with a finite third derivative on an interval, given specific conditions at the endpoints. The problem involves applying Rolle's Theorem and exploring the implications of differentiability and continuity of the function and its derivatives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Rolle's Theorem and the Mean Value Theorem, questioning the continuity of the first derivative and its implications for the second and third derivatives.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the relationship between the differentiability of the function and its derivatives. Some participants express uncertainty about the continuity of the first derivative and its impact on applying the theorems, while others suggest alternative theorems like Darboux's theorem to address the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints regarding the continuity of the first derivative at the endpoints and the implications this has for applying standard theorems. There is also mention of the specific conditions given in the problem statement that may affect the approach taken.

AlonsoMcLaren
Messages
89
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



If f has a finite third derivative f''' on (a,b) and if f(a)=f'(a)=f(b)=f'(b)=0 prove that f'''(c)=0 for some c in (a,b)

Homework Equations



Rolle's Theorem: Assume f has a derivative (finite or infinite) at each point of an open interval (a,b) and assume that f is continuous at both endpoints a and b. If f(a)=f(b) there is at least one interior point c at which f'(c)=0


The Attempt at a Solution



Because f is differentiable at a and b, f is continuous at a and b. Also, we have f(a)=f(b)=0

Therefore, use Rolle's theorem, there exists a<x<e such that f'(x)=0.

If we know that f' is continuous at a and b (I'M STUCK HERE), then we can conclude that there exists a<y<x such that f''(y)=0 and there exists x<z<b such that f''(z)=0. f''(y)=f''(z). Because f has a finite third derivative on (a,b) (If it is [a,b] then it's done...), f'' is continuous on (a,b) and therefore continuous at y and z. Therefore, by Rolle's theorem, there exists y<w<z such that f'''(w)=0..

So you know why I am stuck... Thank your for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My thoughts so far go along the lines of (but I don't really know what I'm talking about):
f(a)=f(b) so at least one f'(c)=0 on the closed interval [a,b].
But also f'(a)=f'(b)=0 so we have at least 3 turning points in f'(x) in (a,b).
Therefore need at least 2 turning points in f''(x) in (a,b)
Then at least 1 turning point in f'''(x) in (a,b), which is almost the answer.
 
superg33k said:
My thoughts so far go along the lines of (but I don't really know what I'm talking about):
f(a)=f(b) so at least one f'(c)=0 on the closed interval [a,b].
But also f'(a)=f'(b)=0 so we have at least 3 turning points in f'(x) in (a,b).
Therefore need at least 2 turning points in f''(x) in (a,b)
Then at least 1 turning point in f'''(x) in (a,b), which is almost the answer.

By which theorem?
 
AlonsoMcLaren said:
By which theorem?

Mean Value Theorem. superg33k is saying you can show, as you have, that there is a c such that a<c<b such that f'(a)=f'(b)=f'(c)=0. What does that tell you about f'' on (a,c) and (c,b)? What does that tell you about f'''?
 
Dick said:
What does that tell you about f'' on (a,c) and (c,b)?

It tells me nothing as f' is not guaranteed to be continuous at a and b so I cannot apply Mean Value Theorem or Rolle's Theorem. Please read my original post.
 
AlonsoMcLaren said:
It tells me nothing as f' is not guaranteed to be continuous at a and b so I cannot apply Mean Value Theorem or Rolle's Theorem. Please read my original post.

If a function is differentiable at a point then it's automatically continuous at that point. You can prove that by looking at the difference quotient.
 
Dick said:
If a function is differentiable at a point then it's automatically continuous at that point. You can prove that by looking at the difference quotient.

But we do not know that f' (NOT f) is differentiable at a and b.
 
AlonsoMcLaren said:
But we do not know that f' (NOT f) is differentiable at a and b.

Ok, I see what you are saying. Finally. The only thing I can think of is to use Darboux's theorem. If f' is discontinuous at 0 then the discontinuity is essential, i.e. the limit x->0 f'(x) doesn't exist. That should make it hard for higher derivatives to be bounded. Seems a little much for a Rolle's theorem problem.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K