Analysis of current flow and EM fields in seawater?

AI Thread Summary
The flow of electricity through seawater differs from that in metal conductors due to the ionic nature of charge carriers, leading to complex and potentially chaotic behaviors. While the electric field patterns between point source electrodes do decay rapidly, the specifics depend on the type of liquid and conditions involved. In terms of practical applications, direct current (DC) can be effectively transmitted through seawater, as seen in underwater high-voltage direct current (HVDC) systems. In contrast, alternating current (AC) faces high impedance issues, making it less feasible for commercial power transmission. Overall, the study of electric fields in seawater intersects with electrochemistry and requires careful consideration of various factors.
vwrobc
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have a few queries regarding the flow of electric current through (sea)water...

In general, can the flow of electricity through seawater be treated the same as through a metal conductor?

I am wondering whether the fact that it is ions rather than electrons that carry the charge has any affect?

If a current flows between two point source electrodes, what would the field patterns look like? I'm assuming the field strengths decay exponentially (as per skin effect) in the plane perpendicular to the direction of current flow. Is this correct?

Thanks for any guidance you can offer!
Rob
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The quick answer would be yes and no.

The flow of electricity in matter isn't a simple thing - even in conductors there are complicated things going on. When you add in the tendency of liquids to slosh around and the complication of the ionic currents that could form, it tends towards chaotic.

From the point of view of Physics, it isn't a terribly interesting question. (Complicated, chaotic systems are just not worth bothering with - they give no insight into the basic mechanisms behind phenomena.)

To an Engineer, it might well be, but then you would have to be very specific about which liquid and under what conditions.
 
It's similar in some ways and dissimilar in others, you have to be a bit specific. The fields definitely decay rapidly - water has a high dielectric constant.

There's no limit to how deep you can delve into this question, since we're talking about the whole field of electrochemistry basically. Direct current or alternating current? With alternating current you end up with a very high impedance, so it's not really feasible to lead commercial power lines through seawater.

But it is for DC, and there's a good number of underwater HVDC transmission systems that lead the return current through the water, meaning you only need one submarine cable. (for instance the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baltic_Cable" connecting Germany and Sweden)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top