B Analysis of Simple Pendulum Motion

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter WuliDancer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Pendulum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the analysis of simple pendulum motion, detailing the construction and parameters involved, such as the pendulum length (L) and angles (α, β). It explains how to calculate the speed (Vα) at various angles using energy conservation principles, emphasizing that tension does not perform work during the pendulum's motion. The mathematical derivation involves geometric relationships and the sine theorem to establish height differences and speed calculations. A mentor notes the complexity of the explanation but confirms the final formula for speed is correct. The analysis highlights the interplay of geometry and physics in understanding pendulum dynamics.
WuliDancer
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
Simple pendulum motion is a type of object motion, and it has its unique (or unique beauty). As a "beauty of kinematics", the speed of the simple pendulum motion is naturally an important part. This article will tell you to use high school physics knowledge to find the speed at each point.
First, we construct a simple pendulum, the length of the rope remains unchanged and the object being swung is doing circular motion. If it is released from point D and reaches point F, we set:
The length of the rope (i.e the pendulum length) is L, ∠FCB=90°, ∠DCF=β, ∠ECF=α, the mass of the particle is m (Note: E is a moving point) (As shown in Figure 1)
Figure 1.png
Figure 2.png

(The left is Figure 1; the right is Figure 2.)
First, we must know the speed Vα corresponding to each α. We can find the height difference and then use the method to calculate the speed. (Note: Energy is a scalar, but speed is a vector, and the direction of speed is always perpendicular to the rope)
DrawDI⊥CF intersecting CF at point I, DI intersects CE at point H, draw EG⊥DI intersecting DI at G (As shown in Figure 2)
In △CDH,
∠CHD = 180°- ∠CHI = 180°- (180°- ∠CIH - ∠ICH) = 90°+ α
∠CDI = 180°- ∠CID - ∠ICD = 90°- β
According to the sine theorem,
CH = L·sin(π/2 - β) / sin(π/2 + α)
HE = L·(1-sin(0.5π - β) / sin(0.5π + α) = L·(1 - cosβ / cosα)
Through the eight-character shape, we get:
∠G = ∠ICH = α
∴GE=∆h=HE· cosα=L· (cosα - cosβ)
Using the conservation of mechanical energy ( tension of the rope is always perpendicular to the direction of motion, so the tension does no work), we get:
Vα=√2g∆h=√2gL (cosα - cosβ)

Mentor note: Last line rewritten in LaTeX
##V_{\alpha} = \sqrt{2gL(\cos(\alpha) - \cos(\beta)}##
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming you mean ##v_\alpha=\sqrt{2gL(\cos\alpha-\cos\beta)}##, this appears to be correct, although an extremely long way of saying what's said. Do you have a question?
 
I just want to share my thoughts with everyone.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top