Analysis - Upper and Lower Bounds

  • Thread starter Thread starter teme92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Bounds
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
teme92
Messages
185
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Let E be a non-empty subset of the real numbers R. De fine carefully each of the terms
(i) 'y is an upper bound for E' and (ii) 'y is the least upper bound for E'

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I've just started doing analysis and I'm unsure how I'm supposed to answer this. As its a definition I can't come up with any solution. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks everyone :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
teme92 said:

Homework Statement



Let E be a non-empty subset of the real numbers R. De fine carefully each of the terms
(i) 'y is an upper bound for E' and (ii) 'y is the least upper bound for E'

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I've just started doing analysis and I'm unsure how I'm supposed to answer this. As its a definition I can't come up with any solution. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks everyone :smile:

You will have go struggle with it---we are not allowed to answer for you. Are you using a textbook? Do you have course notes? Are you claiming that those sources contain nothing on the relevant topics?
 
Hi Ray,

I understand what upper and lower bounds are its just the phrasing of the question that's confusing me. Can I say:

E={x ε R: x≥n & x≤m, n,m εR}

Y is upper bound if y≥n
Y is lower bound if y≤m

Thanks for the quick response and appreciate any further help.
 
teme92 said:
Hi Ray,

I understand what upper and lower bounds are its just the phrasing of the question that's confusing me. Can I say:

E={x ε R: x≥n & x≤m, n,m εR}

Y is upper bound if y≥n
Y is lower bound if y≤m

Thanks for the quick response and appreciate any further help.

No, you have it backwards. The way you have written E, it must be the interval [n,m], but that was not given in the question. All you know is that ##E \subset \mathbb{R}##. For example, E could be all the real numbers of the form ##1-1/n, n = 1,2, \ldots##, and these certainly do not form an interval.

In the lines below, where you say "Y is upper bound if y≥n" etc, you do not say what is n.
 
So do I just say:

i) yεF is an upper bound for E if x≤y whenever xεE

ii) yεF is a least upper bound if y is an upper bound for E and if y1εF and y1≤y then y1 is not an upper bound for E