Analytic Geometry: Proving R Lies on Ellipse

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that point R lies on the ellipse defined by the equation ((x^2)/9) + ((y^2)/4) = 1, given concentric circles with equations x^2 + y^2 = 9 and x^2 + y^2 = 4. The points P and Q are established on the inner and outer circles, respectively, with R defined by the coordinates (x1, y0). The relationship between the coordinates of P and Q is highlighted, particularly that they share a common radius, leading to the equation x_0^2 + y_0^2 = 4 and x_1^2 + y_1^2 = 9. The discussion suggests that by eliminating variables, one can derive the ellipse equation, confirming that R lies on the ellipse. The conversation emphasizes the geometric relationships and algebraic manipulations necessary for the proof.
dajugganaut
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hi all. I have a analytic geometry question that I need a bit of help with.
consider the concentric circles with the equations:

x^2 + y^2 = 9
and
x^2 +y^2 = 4

A radius from the center O intersects the inner circle at P and the outer circle at Q. The line parallel to the x-axis through P meets the line parallel to the y-axis through Q at the point R. Prove that R lies on the ellipse
((x^2)/9) + ((y^2)/4) =1

Some of the facts I've established:

the distance from P to Q is 1 for sure. Also, the triagle PQR is a right angle triangle. using the ellipse equation, i know that the distance from the center to the vertex is 3, and that the distance from the center to the focus is the square root of 5.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why wouldn't the distance of PQ be 5?
 
if the radius of the inner circle is 2 and the outer one is 3, is the distance between them not 1?
 
Yeah, for some reason I wasn't thinking about those being the squares of the radii. Anyway, I think R would have the ascissa of Q and the ordinate of P. If you solve the respective equations for them, you find (\sqrt{9-y^2}, \sqrt{4-x^2}). I would try solve the equation of ellipse for x and then y and it should be equivelent to the coordinates. I'm not very good at making proofs though, so there might be a problem with that way.
 
Last edited:
Write the point P as (x_0,y_0) and Q as (x_1,y_1). The The fact that P and Q lie on the same radius means that \frac{y_0}{x_0}= \frac{y_1}{x_1}. The horizontal line through P (parallel to the x-axis) is y= y0 and the vertical line through Q (parallel to the y-axis) is x= x1. The point R has coordinates (x1,y0). Of course, x_0^2+ y_0^2= 4 and x_1^2+ y_1^2= 9. Thats a total of 3 equation is 4 unknowns. Use the equations to eliminate x1 and y0. I wouldn't be at all surprized if you were left with \frac{x_0^2}{9}+{y_1^2}{4}= 1!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top