Analyzing Critical Points of a Multivariable Function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the critical point of the function f(x,y) = a*x^n + c*y^n, specifically at (0,0), where a and c are non-zero constants. The Hessian matrix's determinant is zero, rendering the second derivative test inconclusive for determining the nature of this critical point. It is suggested that the nature of the critical point can be inferred based on the signs of ac and the parity of n, with different outcomes for minima, maxima, or saddle points. Further analysis can be conducted by evaluating the function's behavior near (0,0) or along various paths approaching this point. Ultimately, alternative methods are necessary to classify the critical point effectively.
pbialos
Given n\geq 2, n\in \aleph and f(x,y)=a*x^n+c*y^n where a*c\not=0, determine the nature of the critical points. I found the only critical point at (0,0) and when i tried to use the criteria of the determinant of the hessian matrix to determine the kind of critical point it was, it gave me 0, so i can`t say nothing by this criteria.
I don't know what kind of analysis of the function i am supposed to do, so any help would be much appreciated.

Many Thanks, Paul.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can say something of the critical points. First, consider the options ac < 0 and ac > 0. If ac > 0, then you just have polynomials that are just positive multiples of each other. If the polynomial is of odd order, you have nothing (think f(x) = x³), and if it is of even order, then you have a minimum if a > 0 (and hence c > 0) or a maximum if a < 0 (and hence c < 0). Now if ac < 0, then if n is odd, then you again have nothing since this is the same if n is odd and ac > 0, just rotated by 90o. If n is even, then you'll have a saddle point of type (1-1) and unlike minima and maxima, an upside down saddle point is still a saddle point (whereas a maximum becomes a minimum).
 


The analysis of critical points for a multivariable function involves determining the points where the partial derivatives of the function are equal to zero. In this case, the only critical point is (0,0) since both partial derivatives of f(x,y) with respect to x and y are equal to zero.

To determine the nature of this critical point, we can use the second derivative test or the Hessian matrix. However, in this case, the Hessian matrix is not helpful since its determinant is equal to zero. This means that the second derivative test does not provide any information about the nature of the critical point.

In order to further analyze the critical point at (0,0), we can look at the behavior of the function around this point. We can do this by plotting the function or by evaluating the function at points close to (0,0). This will help us determine if the critical point is a local maximum, local minimum, or a saddle point.

Additionally, we can also consider the behavior of the function along different paths approaching the critical point. This can give us a better understanding of the behavior of the function at this point.

In conclusion, while the Hessian matrix may not provide any information about the nature of the critical point, there are other methods we can use to analyze the function and determine the nature of the critical point at (0,0).
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top