Analyzing the Physics of a Falling Square Aluminum Loop in a Magnetic Field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the physics of a square aluminum loop falling in a magnetic field. The loop experiences forces due to gravity and electromagnetic effects, with the magnetic field causing it to rotate counter-clockwise as it falls. To find the terminal velocity, the net force on the loop can be set to zero, taking into account both translational and rotational dynamics. If a slit is cut in the loop, it will no longer carry current, altering the forces acting on it and affecting its velocity. The approach to solving the problem involves integrating forces over the loop's segments while considering varying charge densities and rotational inertia.
AKG
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
2,559
Reaction score
4
A square loop is cut out of a thick sheet of aluminum. It is then placed so that the top portion is in a uniform magnetic field B, and allowed to fall under gravity. So the square is in the y-z plane, and the magnetic field is -|B|x say, for z > 0, and the magnetic field is 0 below that. This square loop thus has the top part of it above z=0, and the rest of it is obviously below. If the magnetic field is 1T, find the terminal velocity of the loop. Find the velocity of the loop as a function of time. What would happen if you cut a tiny slit in the loop, breaking the circuit?

Okay, the force on this ring is

-mg\hat{\mathbf{z}} + B(\mathbf{I} + q\mathbf{v}_{falling}) \times (-\hat{\mathbf{x}})

I know that \mathbf{I} will go "counter-clockwise", and we may as well ignore the current in the left and right sides of the square because their effect on the force will cancel out, since the current is in opposite directions for them. So, for the sides, we get:

-mg\hat{\mathbf{z}} + Bqv_{falling}(-\hat{\mathbf{z}}) \times (-\hat{\mathbf{x}})

= -mg\hat{\mathbf{z}} + Bqv_{falling}\hat{\mathbf{y}}

For the top, we get:

-mg\hat{\mathbf{z}} + B(-\hat{\mathbf{y}}\mathcal{E} /R -\hat{\mathbf{z}} qv_{falling}) \times (-\hat{\mathbf{x}})

-mg\hat{\mathbf{z}} + B(-\hat{\mathbf{z}}BLv_{falling} /R + qv_{falling}\hat{\mathbf{y}})

The part outside the field will just experience

-mg\hat{\mathbf{z}}

Actually, the values m, q, and L should be dm, dq, and dL (L is the length of the side of the square). If I integrate these force-per-lenghts over the 6 parts in question (the top edge, the top portion of the right side that is in the field, the bottom portion of the right side that isn't in the field, the bottom edge, and both parts of the left side), I should get the total force. Dividing by the mass, I'll get the acceleration, and integrating with respect to time, I'll get the velocity. From this, I can find velocity with respect to time. Also, if after finding the net force, I set it to zero, I should be able to solve for v_{falling} to get the terminal velocity.

If a snip is made, then no current flows, and the only forces are the gravitational force, and the magnetic force due to the velocity of the charges which now only the velocity from falling (and no longer is there a component to the velocity attributable to current). Is this all right?

I expect L to cancel out, and if the loop has a cross-sectional area A, that should also cancel out. If aluminum has density D, then using Avogadro's number and the atomic number for aluminum, I can find the charge density. I will thus be able to find things like dq and dm. Is this the right approach to all of this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Firstly, it is important to note that the force on the loop is dependent on the direction of the magnetic field. In this case, the magnetic field is in the -x direction for z > 0, which means that the loop will experience a force in the +y direction. This will cause the loop to rotate in a counter-clockwise direction as it falls, as you correctly pointed out.

To find the terminal velocity, we can set the net force on the loop to zero, as you mentioned. This will give us an equation for the velocity, which we can solve for to get the terminal velocity. However, since the loop is rotating, we need to consider the rotational inertia of the loop as well. This will affect the velocity and thus the terminal velocity.

To find the velocity as a function of time, we can use the equations of motion for a falling object with a constant force. However, we also need to consider the rotational motion of the loop, so we will need to use the equations of rotational motion as well. This will give us a system of equations that we can solve to find the velocity as a function of time.

If a tiny slit is cut in the loop, breaking the circuit, then no current will flow and the loop will only experience the gravitational force and the magnetic force due to its velocity. This will change the dynamics of the loop and it will no longer rotate as it falls. The velocity of the loop will also be affected, as there will be no current flowing to generate a magnetic force.

Your approach to finding the net force and integrating to find the acceleration and velocity is correct. However, it is important to note that the dimensions of the loop will not cancel out completely. The force on each side of the loop will depend on its length, so the total force will still have a dependence on the dimensions of the loop. Additionally, the charge density of aluminum will not be constant throughout the loop, so the values of dm and dq will also vary. It may be helpful to consider the loop as a collection of small segments, each with its own length and charge density, and then integrate over all of these segments to find the net force.

Overall, your approach seems to be correct, but it may require some fine-tuning and consideration of additional factors such as rotational inertia and varying charge densities. It is a complex problem, but with careful analysis and calculations, the terminal velocity and velocity as a function of time can be determined.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top