And what the difference between waves and pulses?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics user1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulse Wave Waves
AI Thread Summary
Pulses are defined as localized disturbances that have a finite extent in space and time, while waves are continuous oscillations. A pulse can consist of one or more complete wavelengths, but it is characterized by its abrupt start and stop, which indicates a complex frequency content. Both examples discussed illustrate different types of pulses rather than continuous waves. Pulsed waves can be created by combining multiple sinusoidal waves of varying frequencies. The distinction lies in the nature of their propagation and the characteristics of their frequency content.
physics user1
In images I always seen pulses as a part of a wave corresponding to an half of a piece of wave, but it is called still a pulse when we have a part with a complete wavelength? I mean this (in the photo)

And what the difference between waves and pulses?

What I think is that is still a pulse because a wave is a non stoping oscillation, not just one
 

Attachments

  • 1451665265899-670310684.jpg
    1451665265899-670310684.jpg
    33.4 KB · Views: 628
Physics news on Phys.org
A pulse is a form of wave. In particular, it's called pulse, usually because it has finite extent in space and time - it's oscillating and propagating, but confined within certain spatial extent at any given time. So, in this regard, both situations you drew there describe two different pulses. You can build a pulsed wave by superposing many sinusoidal waves of different frequencies. For example, try plotting ##\sum_{k=1}^10 \sin k\omega x##, you should see that this function takes the form a repeated pulses which also oscillates along.
 
I would call the first one a doublet and the second one a pulse. The difference from a wave is the abrupt start and stop that implies a very complicated frequency content. Usually the doublet and the pulse are in the form of steps, but I would still guess that the frequency content of your examples are closer to the doublet / pulse than to a continuous wave.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top