Angle Between Hour & Second Hand:130.25° or 133°?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ador250
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clock
AI Thread Summary
The correct angle between the hour and second hand of a clock set to 10:20:30 is 130.25°. The hour hand moves 0.5° per minute, so after 20.5 minutes, it has traversed an additional 10.25°, totaling 310.25° from the 10 o'clock position. The second hand, after 30 seconds, is at the 6 o'clock position, which is 180°. The confusion arose from an incorrect calculation that mistakenly included an extra angular distance from the minute hand, leading to the incorrect answer of 133°. The accurate calculation clarifies the angle between the two hands.
ador250
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
a clock was set 10 am 20 minutes 30 second ? what will be the angle between hour & second hand ??

ans : 130.25° or 133° which one is correct? I'm confused
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The line of reasoning should be as follows:-

It takes 12 hours for the hour hand to make a complete 360° rotation, i.e.

12 hours-------> 360°
==> 1 hour -------> 30°
==> 60 min -------> 30°
==> 1 min -------> 0.5°
==> 20.5 min -------> 10.25°

So, in a time period of 20.5 minutes, the hour hand would have traversed 10.25°.

Now, when the clock shows 10 A.M exactly, the hour hand has traversed 300° (since for each hour, the hour hand traverses 30°. So, after 10 hours exactly, it has traversed 300°). And in a further 20 minutes and 30 seconds, i.e. 20.5 minutes, it would have traversed 10.25° further, as we have just calculated above. So, the total angular distance traversed by the hour hand is (300+10.25)° = 310.25°.

Now, the second hand is at the exact position '6' in the clock (since it travels for a period of 30 seconds), and hence has traversed exactly half of the clock, thus traveling an angular distance of 180°.

Therefore, the angle between the hour hand and the second hand would be (310.25 - 180)° = 130.25°.

Hope that makes it clear! :smile:
 
The more interesting question is how the other answer was obtained.

Offhand, it looks like a factor of 12 got erroneously applied to the seconds correction.
 
jbriggs444 said:
The more interesting question is how the other answer was obtained.

Offhand, it looks like a factor of 12 got erroneously applied to the seconds correction.

The best explanation I could come up with is, that the OP first figured that at exactly 10:20 A.M, the hour hand would have traversed 310°. Then, for the remaining 30 seconds, he mistakenly calculated the angular distance traversed by the minute hand, which turns out to be 3°, and then added it to the angular distance traversed by the hour hand, giving him the final value of the latter as 313°. And since the second hand has traversed 180°, he obtains (313 - 180)° = 133°, which is false.
 
Ryuzaki said:
... Then, for the remaining 30 seconds, he mistakenly calculated the angular distance traversed by the minute hand, which turns out to be 3°...

Nice. That fits.
 
got it man...thanks :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top