MHB Angle between the tangents to the circle

  • Thread starter Thread starter ramz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Circle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angle T between tangents to a circle, which is determined to be approximately 87.9 degrees. The cosine rule is suggested as a method for evaluating the angle at the circle's origin. Participants emphasize that radii and tangents are perpendicular, which aids in solving the problem using the properties of quadrilaterals. The outlined steps include using the Pythagorean theorem, the law of sines, and the relationships between angles in triangles. Ultimately, the calculations confirm the angle T's value as 87.89 degrees.
ramz
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
View attachment 4819

Hi everyone, I need further explanations about the answer of this problem.
The answer is angle T = 87.9 degrees.

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • circumcircle.jpg
    circumcircle.jpg
    6.8 KB · Views: 88
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ramz said:
Hi everyone, I need further explanations about the answer of this problem.
The answer is angle T = 87.9 degrees.

Thanks.

Use the cosine rule to evaluate the angle on the origin of the circle.

Radii and tangents to a circle are always perpendicular.

Once you realize this, you have three angles in the quadrilateral OBTA. The angle sum of a quadrilateral is 360 degrees. You should be able to evaluate angle T from there.
 
Ahh. Thank you so much.
 
Ahh. Thank you so much.
 
Prove It's method is more succinct, but here's an outline of what I did:

1.) Bisect $\triangle ABO$ and use the Pythagorean theorem to find the altitude.

2.) Use the law of sines to find $\angle OAB$.

3.) Use that fact the a tangent to a circle and a radius to the tangent point are perpendicular to find $\angle BAT$.

4.) Use the fact that $\angle BAT=\angle ABT$ and the sum of interior angles of a triangle being $180^{\circ}$ to find $\angle BTA$.

5.) Use the fact that $\angle BTA+\angle T=180^{\circ}$.

You should find $$\angle T=180^{\circ}\left(1-\frac{2}{\pi}\arccos\left(\frac{\sqrt{301}}{25}\right)\right)\approx87.89^{\circ}$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top