Angled Length Contraction (Relativity)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the length of a meter stick angled at 60 degrees while moving at 0.8c, using Lorentz transformations. The initial calculations yielded a length of approximately 91 cm, which contradicted the expected 82 cm from the textbook. Participants clarified that the angle of 60 degrees is in the lab frame, meaning the angle in the stick's rest frame is larger. A more systematic approach using the correct reference frames and algebra led to the correct length of approximately 83.2 cm. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding reference frames in relativistic problems.
Blanchdog
Messages
56
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


Find the length of a meter stick if in the laboratory frame it is angled at 60 degrees relative to the direction of motion, and it is traveling at .8 c.

I have calculated gamma to be 1.667

Homework Equations


Lorentz transformations

The Attempt at a Solution


a' = l' cos(x), b = l' sin(x)
a = cos(60), b = sin(60)
a' = a/gamma, b' = b
l' cos(x) = cos(60)/gamma, l' sin(x) = sin(60)
combine by eliminating l'
cos(60)/(cos(x) gamma) = sin(60)/sin(x)
tan(x) = tan(60) gamma
x = arctan(tan(60) gamma)
plug x back into solve for l'

l' = cos(60)/(cos(x) gamma)

This gives me a result of about 91 cm, but the book says it should be 82 cm. Where did I go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Blanchdog said:

Homework Statement


Find the length of a meter stick if in the laboratory frame it is angled at 60 degrees relative to the direction of motion, and it is traveling at .8 c.

I have calculated gamma to be 1.667

Homework Equations


Lorentz transformations

The Attempt at a Solution


a' = l' cos(x), b = l' sin(x)
a = cos(60), b = sin(60)
a' = a/gamma, b' = b
l' cos(x) = cos(60)/gamma, l' sin(x) = sin(60)
combine by eliminating l'
cos(60)/(cos(x) gamma) = sin(60)/sin(x)
tan(x) = tan(60) gamma
x = arctan(tan(60) gamma)
plug x back into solve for l'

l' = cos(60)/(cos(x) gamma)

This gives me a result of about 91 cm, but the book says it should be 82 cm. Where did I go wrong?

I can't follow what you are trying to do at all. When you say ##a = \cos(60)##, what is ##a##?
 
PeroK said:
I can't follow what you are trying to do at all. When you say ##a = \cos(60)##, what is ##a##?

I'm treating the meter stick as the hypotenuse of a right triangle. a is aligned with the x-axis (the direction of motion) and b is aligned with the y-axis (perpendicular to the direction of motion).
 
Blanchdog said:
I'm treating the meter stick as the hypotenuse of a right triangle. a is aligned with the x-axis (the direction of motion) and b is aligned with the y-axis (perpendicular to the direction of motion).

In what frame is this? If you are in the rest frame of the stick, then the angle is not ##60°##. And if you are in the lab frame, then the lengths are not simply ##\cos## and ##\sin## as the stick is not of unit length in this frame.
 
`
PeroK said:
In what frame is this? If you are in the rest frame of the stick, then the angle is not ##60°##. And if you are in the lab frame, then the lengths are not simply ##\cos## and ##\sin## as the stick is not of unit length in this frame.

The angle is 60 degrees in the lab frame, meaning that the angle in the frame of the meter stick will be larger than 60 degrees. I denote this by x in the problem. And I can see why the I cannot use a unit length there, but I'm not sure how I can solve it since I know either l and don't know the angle or I know the angle and don't know l, depending on the reference frame. In this case, I need to figure out l (l') in the lab reference frame. I feel like there should be some sort of Lorentz angle transformation, but I've only see that for velocities, not distances.
 
Blanchdog said:
`The angle is 60 degrees in the lab frame, meaning that the angle in the frame of the meter stick will be larger than 60 degrees. I denote this by x in the problem. And I can see why the I cannot use a unit length there, but I'm not sure how I can solve it since I know either l and don't know the angle or I know the angle and don't know l, depending on the reference frame. In this case, I need to figure out l (l') in the lab reference frame. I feel like there should be some sort of Lorentz angle transformation, but I've only see that for velocities, not distances.

What do you know in the lab frame? Write down what you can. Hint: take the length in the lab frame to be ##L## with ##L^2 = a^2 + b^2##, where ##a, b## are the components of length in the direction of motion and perpendicular to the direction of motion respectively.

Hint: forget the angle in the rest frame of the rod - you don't need it.

Suggestion: use ##v, \gamma, \theta## and solve the problem generally. At this level, you should be using algebra - for many reasons - in preference to plugging in numbers at the outset.
 
PeroK said:
What do you know in the lab frame? Write down what you can.

Going to change notation here from above, everything denoted with a subscript 0 like this (X0) will be the value for the meter stick's frame, everything without a subscript will be in the lab reference frame.

Lab Reference Frame:
L2 = a2 + b2
v = .8 c
γ = 1.667
a = a0 / γ
b = b0
a = L cos (θ)
b = L sin (θ)

Meter stick reference frame:
L0 = 1
L02 = a02 + b02

Substituting into the final expression above:

L02 = (aγ)2 + b2
L02 = (L cos(θ) γ)2 + (L sin(θ))2
L02 = L2 ((cos(θ) γ)2 + (sin(θ))2)
L = √(L02/(cos(θ)2 γ2 + sin(θ)2))

Plugging in numbers:

L = √(1/(cos(60)2 * 1.6672 + sin(60)2))
L = .832 m, which is the correct answer! Thanks for the help.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes PeroK
As an aside, you can see the relationship between the angles is:

##\tan(\theta) = \frac{b}{a} = \frac{b_0}{a_0/\gamma} = \gamma \frac{b_0}{a_0} = \gamma \tan(\theta_0)##
 
  • Like
Likes physics_CD
Back
Top