Angular Acceleration and torque problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a 12 kg mass on a frictionless incline connected to a wheel. Key points include calculating the tension in the cord, the moment of inertia of the wheel, and the angular speed after 2 seconds. Participants emphasize the importance of considering gravitational forces and the relationship between linear and angular acceleration, using the equation a = αr. The correct tension was determined to be approximately 46.8 N, and the moment of inertia was calculated as 0.234 kg·m². The conversation highlights the need for clarity in understanding the forces at play and the relationships between them.
BrainMan
Messages
279
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A 12 kg mass is attached to a cord that is wrapped around a wheel of radius r = 10 cm (Fig. 8.20). The acceleration of the mass down the friction-less incline is 2.0 m/s^2/. Assuming the axle of the wheel to be friction-less, determine (a) the tension in the cord, (b) the moment of inertia of the wheel , and (c) the angular speed of the wheel 2 s after it begins rotating, starting from rest.


Homework Equations


F = ma




The Attempt at a Solution


I found the tangential force by using F = ma and found it to be 24. I am not sure how to continue to find the angular acceleration and moment of inertia because the question doesn't give the mass of the wheel.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1405189285.427442.jpg
 
You're not given the mass of the wheel, but you are given the acceleration of the object.

If you were given the mass of the wheel instead of the acceleration of the object, would you be able to figure out the acceleration?

If so, then you should be able to figure out the mass given the acceleration.
 
Nathanael said:
You're not given the mass of the wheel, but you are given the acceleration of the object.

If you were given the mass of the wheel instead of the acceleration of the object, would you be able to figure out the acceleration?

If so, then you should be able to figure out the mass given the acceleration.
OK so I need to find the acceleration of the block down the hill and that will be the acceleration on the wheel? If so how do I do that?
 
BrainMan said:
OK so I need to find the acceleration of the block down the hill and that will be the acceleration on the wheel? If so how do I do that?

You don't need to find the acceleration of the block down the hill, because the problem has already told you that it is 2 m/s^2

The linear acceleration of the block is equal to the linear acceleration of the edge of the wheel.
(This assumes the rope doesn't slip on the pulley, which you need to assume for the problem to be solvable.)

This gives you the equation:
a =\alpha r
Where "a" is the linear acceleration (=2 m/s^2) and "\alpha" is the angular acceleration of the wheel.
 
Nathanael said:
You don't need to find the acceleration of the block down the hill, because the problem has already told you that it is 2 m/s^2

The linear acceleration of the block is equal to the linear acceleration of the edge of the wheel.
(This assumes the rope doesn't slip on the pulley, which you need to assume for the problem to be solvable.)

This gives you the equation:
a =\alpha r
Where "a" is the linear acceleration (=2 m/s^2) and "\alpha" is the angular acceleration of the wheel.

OK I did that and got the last part of the problem right. However, I am still having trouble with the second part of the problem. So

Ft = ma
Ft = 12(2)
Ft = 24
T = Ft*r
T = 24 * .1
T = 2.4
T = I*a
T = I * 20
2.4 = I *20
I = .12

The correct answer is 0.234 kg * m2
 
BrainMan said:
OK I did that and got the last part of the problem right. However, I am still having trouble with the second part of the problem. So

Ft = ma
Ft = 12(2)
Ft = 24
T = Ft*r
T = 24 * .1
T = 2.4
T = I*a
T = I * 20
2.4 = I *20
I = .12

The correct answer is 0.234 kg * m2
Ft is the net downslope force on the block, right? But you have equated that to the tension, which is an applied upslope force, and neglected gravity.
 
haruspex said:
Ft is the net downslope force on the block, right? But you have equated that to the tension, which is an applied upslope force, and neglected gravity.

Why do I have to use gravity it already tells me that the block is accelerating down the slop at 2 m/s^2?
 
BrainMan said:
Why do I have to use gravity it already tells me that the block is accelerating down the slop at 2 m/s^2?

Because the two forces on the block are gravity and tension (in opposite directions)

You don't know the tension, but you do know the gravity and you know the net acceleration (and thererfore net force) so you can use that to find the tension
 
  • #10
Nathanael said:
Because the two forces on the block are gravity and tension (in opposite directions)

You don't know the tension, but you do know the gravity and you know the net acceleration (and thererfore net force) so you can use that to find the tension

So do I do
Fg + A = T?
 
  • #11
Fg - T = M*a

Fg - Ma = T
 
  • #12
Nathanael said:
Fg - T = M*a

Fg - Ma = T

How did you get these equations?
 
  • #13
BrainMan said:
How did you get these equations?

Well the second one is just a rearrangement of the first one.

I forgot to mention: "Fg" is not mg, it's the just the component of mg down the slope.


I got the equation because "Fg" (the force of gravity down the slope) is pulling the object down the slope, while the tension "T" is pulling the object up the slope.

The net acceleration is "a" down the slope so the net force is "m*a" (directed down the slope)

Since there is no other forces acting (the normal force is canceled by a component of gravity) those two forces ("Fg" and "T") must add to give "ma" (They are in opposite directions, so that's where the negative sign comes from)


This wasn't worded very clearly, but I hope you understand what I was trying to say
 
  • #14
BrainMan said:
How did you get these equations?
The acceleration of the block is the net force on the block divided by the mass of the block.

The component of force due to gravity on a frictionless incline = m g sin(θ)
The opposing force is the tension in the rope = T.

The net force on the block in the direction of slope of the incline = m g sin(θ) - T

The acceleration of the block = (m g sin(θ) - T) / m = g sin(θ) - T / m = g sin(37°) - T / 12kg = 2 m / s^2, use this to solve for T. The unknown here is what value to use for g, 9.80665, 9.8, 9.81, ... ?
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Nathanael said:
Well the second one is just a rearrangement of the first one.

I forgot to mention: "Fg" is not mg, it's the just the component of mg down the slope.


I got the equation because "Fg" (the force of gravity down the slope) is pulling the object down the slope, while the tension "T" is pulling the object up the slope.

The net acceleration is "a" down the slope so the net force is "m*a" (directed down the slope)

Since there is no other forces acting (the normal force is canceled by a component of gravity) those two forces ("Fg" and "T") must add to give "ma" (They are in opposite directions, so that's where the negative sign comes from)


This wasn't worded very clearly, but I hope you understand what I was trying to say
So gravity is not causing the 2 m/s^2 acceleration. I understand how you got the variables but I am still confused on the relationships between them. I know that the force of gravity and the force of the acceleration are both in the same direction and are resisted by the tension. However, the formula is not Fg + ma = T. Why is this?
 
  • #16
BrainMan said:
So gravity is not causing the 2 m/s^2 acceleration. I understand how you got the variables but I am still confused on the relationships between them. I know that the force of gravity and the force of the acceleration are both in the same direction and are resisted by the tension. However, the formula is not Fg + ma = T. Why is this?

Because the "force of acceleration" is not really a force in the system.

You know (from Fnet=ma) that the net force on the block has to be ma, but ma is not really a force acting on the block, it's just the result of combining the other forces (tension and gravity)
 
  • #17
BrainMan said:
So gravity is not causing the 2 m/s^2 acceleration.
Take a look at post #14, which explains the math in more detail.
 
  • #18
rcgldr said:
Take a look at post #14, which explains the math in more detail.

OK so I did that and am still getting the question wrong so
(g sin 37 -T)/12 = 2
g sin 37 -T = 24
5.898 - T = 24
T = -18.102
The book says the correct answer is 46.8 N
 
  • #19
It acidentally double posted this... Is there a way to delete posts?

@rcgldr, I don't see a delete button. (I've seen it, and used it, before, but it's now nowhere to be found)
 
Last edited:
  • #20
it should be:

g sin(37°) - T/12 = 24

(The "g sin(37)" is already divided by 12, because it was originally "mg sin(37)" so you don't need to divide it by 12 again)
 
  • #21
Continuing from post #14, as mentioned g sin(37°) was already divided by the mass of 12 kg:

g sin(37°) - T / 12kg = 2 m / s^2

(9.80665) (0.6018) - T / 12 = 2
T/12 = (9.80665) (0.6018) - 2 = 5.9018 - 2 = 3.9018
T = (12) (3.9018) = 46.82 N

@Nathanael - yes you can delete a post. Select edit, and you'll see a "Delete" button.
 
Last edited:
  • #22
Heres my take on this problem :

g assumed at 9.81 (m/s)/s

The force down the slope created by the mass of the block = m * g * ( sine ( 37 ° ) )
= 70.8457 N

The force required to accelerate the 12 kg mass @ 2.0 ( m / s ) / s
= m * a
= 24 N

The remainder must be driving the wheel = 70.8457 - 24 = 46.8457 N
(this is the tension on the string)

The torque on the wheel = 46.8457 * 0.1
= 4.68457 N-m

The angular acceleration = 2.0 / 0.1
= 20.0 ( rad / sec ) / sec

The mass moment of inertia :
= torque / angular acceleration
= 4.68457 / 20.0
= 0.2342 kg-m²

The angular rotation rate after 2 seconds :
= angular acceleration * time
= 20.0 * 2.0
= 40 rad / sec
 
  • #23
Dean Barry, you're supposed to let the OP solve the problem.

Guidelines for students and helpers said:
9. Helpers: don't provide the entire solution
 
Back
Top