Angular acceleration at the bottom

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an ice cube released from rest at the top of a hemispherical bowl, with a focus on determining its acceleration at the bottom. The context is centered around concepts of forces, acceleration, and the effects of gravity in a circular motion scenario.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the role of gravitational force and whether to consider rotational energy. Some express uncertainty about the relevance of centripetal force and normal force in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is exploring various interpretations of the forces acting on the ice cube, particularly the relationship between gravitational force and normal force. Some participants have suggested that the normal force is greater than gravity, while others are questioning the assumptions made regarding the forces involved.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing debate about the necessity of considering rotational aspects and the nature of the forces acting on the ice cube, including the potential upward force from the bowl's wall. Participants are also navigating the implications of the problem's constraints, such as the assumption of a small ice cube and the neglect of friction.

kolua
Messages
69
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


You hold a small ice cube near the top edge of a hemispherical bowl of radius 100 mm. You release the cube from rest. What is the magnitude of its acceleration at the instant it reaches the bottom of the bowl? Ignore friction.

Homework Equations


a=v^2/r delta U= delta Krot +delta Ktrans

The Attempt at a Solution


mgR=1/2Iw^2+1/2mv^2
a=v^2/rSo I'm not sure if it is so far so good. How do I find the rotational inertia here? How should I approach this question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can infer from the question saying 'small ice cube' that they want you to ignore any rotational energy of the cube. Such energy will be trivial if it is small, and cannot be calculated without knowing the size of the cube.
 
It's not usual rotation problem, because of the source of force is only gravity. As you know, it always acts toward ground, so you don't have to consider the rotational things.
 
kolua said:

Homework Statement


You hold a small ice cube near the top edge of a hemispherical bowl of radius 100 mm. You release the cube from rest. What is the magnitude of its acceleration at the instant it reaches the bottom of the bowl? Ignore friction.

Homework Equations


a=v^2/r delta U= delta Krot +delta Ktrans

The Attempt at a Solution


mgR=1/2Iw^2+1/2mv^2
a=v^2/rSo I'm not sure if it is so far so good. How do I find the rotational inertia here? How should I approach this question.

does a=2g sound good?
 
Last edited:
There is no horizontal forces acting the ice cube and only exist the vertical forces. The source of vertical force is only one. That is gravity.
 
kolua said:
does a=2g sound good?
Yes, it is correct.
 
ehild said:
Yes, it is correct.
Daeho Ro says it's only g?
 
You do not need to believe anybody. How did you get your result?
 
Daeho Ro said:
There is no horizontal forces acting the ice cube and only exist the vertical forces. The source of vertical force is only one. That is gravity.
There is not only gravity acting on the ice cube in the bowl. What do you think it is, and in what direction, up or down?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Daeho Ro
  • #10
ehild said:
There is not only gravity acting on the ice cube in the bowl. What do you think it is, and in what direction, up or down?
I think there's also a centripetal force that's upward. And that give the Fnet=mg=F-mg F=2mg=ma a=2g?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Daeho Ro
  • #11
kolua said:
I think there's also a centripetal force that's upward. And that give the Fnet=mg=F-mg F=2mg=ma a=2g?
The centripetal force does not "act": it is the resultant force needed to maintain circular motion with given radius and velocity. The wall of the bowl and the ice cube are in contact. Do they not exert force to each other? How this force is called?
 
  • #12
ehild said:
The centripetal force does not "act": it is the resultant force needed to maintain circular motion with given radius and velocity. The wall of the bowl and the ice cube are in contact. Do they not exert force to each other? How this force is called?
Yes. I think's it's the contact force?
 
  • #13
kolua said:
Yes. I think's it's the contact force?
Yes, or normal force. What do you think its magnitude is now?
 
  • #14
Daeho Ro said:
The source of vertical force is only one. That is gravity.
I think my explanation is somewhat odd. Ignore this thing.

The forces acting on the ice cube are gravity and normal force. Of course, the normal force is larger than the gravity and the difference of these forces is acting as the centripetal force.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
ehild said:
Yes, or normal force. What do you think its magnitude is now?
a=2g=19.6m/s^2?
 
  • #16
You gave the acceleration. I asked the normal force.
 
  • #17
ehild said:
You gave the acceleration. I asked the normal force.
3mg
 
  • #18
Yes. Upward or downward?
 
  • #19
ehild said:
Yes. Upward or downward?
upward
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K