Angular and Linear Velocity Calculations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating angular and linear velocities for a driver wheel with specific parameters. The angular velocity (Omega) is calculated as 78.53 rad/s based on the wheel's maximum speed of 750 rpm. The relationship between linear speed and angular speed is questioned, highlighting the need for further calculations. The maximum force transmitted by the belt is linked to the normal force and static friction coefficient, emphasizing the importance of understanding friction in this context. Lastly, the calculation of angular retardation when the wheel speed is reduced to 300 rpm over 10 seconds is addressed, with suggestions for using relevant equations of motion.
Britannia
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Please could I have some help with the following question:

A driver wheel, which runs a drive belt has a diameter of 600mm and can run at a maximum speed of 750rpm. If the belt has a static coefficient of friction of 0.9 and a dynamic coefficient of friction of 0.87, calculate:

a) The angular velocity (Omega) of the wheel in rad/s.

b)The linear velocity of the wheel.

c) If the normal force between the belt and the driver wheel is 750N, what will be the maximum force which can be transmitted when the belt is running at a constant speed? Explain your answer.

d) If the speed of the wheel is reduced to 300rpm, over a period of 10s, calaulate the angular retardation.

Thanks for any help,

Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is what I got for a):

Omega1 = 750x2PI/60 = 78.53rad/s
 
Britannia said:
This is what I got for a):

Omega1 = 750x2PI/60 = 78.53rad/s

Good so far.

b) What is the relationship between linear speed and angular speed? I.e. do you know of a relationship between v and \omega?

c) I don't like the wording on this one. I'm assuming the question is talking about the force on the track being transmitted by the driver wheel because that's the only question we can answer. So, assuming the track is not slipping on the driver wheel the friction is static. We know the normal force and the coefficient of static friction...

d) Assume you know that the angular retardation is constant. (Or that you are finding the average angular retardation.) You know the change in angular speed, and you know how long it takes to do it. There are four equations that are typically used:
\theta=\theta_0+\omega_0t+(1/2)\alpha t^2
\theta=\theta_0+(1/2)(\omega_0+\omega )t
\omega=\omega_0+\alpha t
\omega^2=\omega_0^2+\alpha (\theta - \theta_0)
Which one looks useful?

-Dan
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top