Angular momentum: disk with point mass on the edge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the instantaneous angular momentum of a disk with an additional point mass on its edge, which is both rotating and translating. The total angular momentum of the system can be determined by summing the angular momentum of the disk and the point mass. However, the moments of inertia must be adjusted to account for the shift in the center of mass caused by the point mass. It is clarified that the moment of inertia of the disk changes depending on the axis of rotation, and the contribution from the point mass must be included in the calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding how the addition of the point mass affects the overall dynamics of the system.
willywilly
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm treating a problem concerning a disk containing an additional point mass on the edge. The disk is moving (rotating and translating) relative to another fixed point, meanwhile it's spinning about its axes of symmetry.
I'd like to determine the instantaneous angular momentum about the disk center and the resulting instantaneous moment the system (point mass+disk) exerts on the disk center.

Is the total angular momentum equal to the angular momentum of the point mass + the angular momentum of the disk?
Is it allowed to consider the moments of inertia about the disk center unchanged when an additional point mass is added, neglecting the latter?

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
WillyWilly
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you can assume the conservation of angular momentum

Not clear where the point of rotation is - is it fixed at the centre of the disk?

In other words a shift in centre of gravity when the point mass is added on the disk
 
The rotation is about the center of gravity of the disk, called G, containing no point mass.
 
Total angular momentum is indeed a simple sum of angular momenta of the constituents, as are the moments of inertia, but it is not that simple in your case because the moment of inertia of the disk (without considering the point mass) is different about different axes, and the presence of the point mass fixed to the disk has shiften the centre of mass outwards from the centre.edit- oh I misread, if the disk is still spinning about its centre, then the total moment of inertial is that of the disk plus the mr^2 from the point.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top