Angular momentum extended body

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the angular momentum of two colliding slender rods relative to their center of mass, it's essential to use the center of mass as the reference point. The formula L = mvR can be applied, where R is the distance from the center of mass to the point of interest. Since the rods are not rotating initially, focus on the motion of each rod's center of mass. Transforming the diagram to a frame where the center of mass is at rest simplifies the calculations. Understanding the significance of the center of mass in angular momentum calculations is crucial for accurate results.
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
Suppose I have the system on the attached file, where two slender rods collide. I want to calculate the angular momentum of the system before collision relative to the center of mass of the two rods. I'm however not sure how to do this. Definately the formula L=Iw doesn't apply, since I don't know from which point I should measure the angular velocity. Equivalently I don't know where what R to use if I use the formula: L = mvR. It seems intuitive if it was the center of mass, but why it is, I have no idea. Who can explain what R to use and why?
 

Attachments

  • collision.png
    collision.png
    10.4 KB · Views: 516
Physics news on Phys.org
You can always treat the total angular momentum of a system as composed of the angular momentum due to the motion of its center of mass plus the angular momentum about its center of mass.

If you wish to use the center of mass as your origin for computing angular momentum, just transform your first diagram to a frame in which the center of mass is at rest. Since neither rod is rotating (at first), all you have to worry about is the motion of each rod's center of mass.
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces not real just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Effects of External Torques on the Angular Momentum of Asymmetric Bodies
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Mechanics of an inertial balance
Replies
6
Views
1K
Conceptual questions about Angular Momentum Conservation and torque
Replies
2
Views
3K
I Conservation of angular momentum during collisions
Replies
3
Views
3K
I Angular Momentum problem v2 (mass moving inward or outward)
Replies
5
Views
2K
Ball hits a pivoting rod, what torque changes the angular momentum of the ball?
Replies
14
Views
2K
2-body problem - conservation of angular momentum
Replies
40
Views
4K
Conservation of linear and angular momentum
Replies
9
Views
2K
Is angular momentum taken about a point or an axis?
Replies
17
Views
2K
I How Does the Book's Formula for Angular Momentum Differ from Mine?
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top