Angular momentum in a half rotating body

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conservation of angular momentum, specifically the formula L=mvr, in the context of a half-rotating body oscillating between 0 and Pi. It concludes that while the classical formula applies to unidirectional rotation, it does not hold for oscillatory motion due to the need for continuous energy input to switch directions. The dynamics change as the radius of the oscillating object varies, necessitating a non-radial force to maintain motion, which disrupts angular momentum conservation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum (L=mvr)
  • Familiarity with oscillatory motion and its dynamics
  • Basic knowledge of forces and energy in physics
  • Concept of torque and its role in motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of non-radial forces on angular momentum conservation
  • Explore the dynamics of oscillatory systems in classical mechanics
  • Investigate the role of torque in changing motion directions
  • Learn about energy transfer in oscillatory systems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the principles of angular momentum and oscillatory motion dynamics.

DiracPool
Messages
1,254
Reaction score
514
If we look at the classical formula for the conservation of angular momentum, L=mvr, we can easily see that, if the radius of a rotating body is shortened, its velocity must increase in order to conserve L, and vice-versa.

Again, the classical conception we have of this formula is its application to a spinning or rotating body, rotating in a unidirectional clockwise or counterclockwise fashion.

My question is this: Does this same formula hold for an object that is not going fully around a unit circle, say, but it oscillating back and forth through half of the circle. In other words, say it oscillates back and forth between 0 and Pi, confined to only the first and second quadrants of the circle. How would the dynamics of the system change in this circumstance? You would think that, even though you can assign a specific frequency to the back and forth oscillation, the fact that you would be constantly accelerating and decelerating in order to switch directions would constantly be shifting the radius of the oscillating object in order to conserve the angular momentum.

Is this assumption correct? Is there a different formula/equation that is used to model such an occurrence?

Edit: Or is the deal here that conservation of angular momentum doesn't apply in this instance because energy/torque must continually be added to the system in order to keep switching directions?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
To oscillate back and forth, you need some non-radial force, and angular momentum cannot be conserved (unless something else oscillates in the opposite way, but then you have different velocities for different parts of the setup).
 
mfb said:
To oscillate back and forth, you need some non-radial force, and angular momentum cannot be conserved (unless something else oscillates in the opposite way, but then you have different velocities for different parts of the setup).

Yeah, that makes sense. Thanks mfb.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K