Angular momentum of rigid body elements tensor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the angular momentum tensor for rigid body elements, specifically using the equation \( H = \sum_{i} m_{i} [ r_{i} \wedge (\omega \wedge r_{i})] \). Participants clarify the transition from this equation to the representation using three matrices, emphasizing the role of the vector cross product in Cartesian coordinates. The use of skew-symmetric matrices for vector cross products is highlighted as a more efficient method compared to traditional triple vector product calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum in rigid body dynamics
  • Familiarity with vector cross products and their properties
  • Knowledge of matrix multiplication and skew-symmetric matrices
  • Basic principles of mechanics and rigid body motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of angular momentum tensors in rigid body dynamics
  • Learn about skew-symmetric matrices and their applications in physics
  • Explore the mathematical properties of vector cross products
  • Investigate advanced topics in rigid body motion and dynamics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone studying rigid body dynamics, particularly those interested in angular momentum calculations and matrix representations.

ognik
Messages
626
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I was working through my text on deriving the tensor for Angular momentum of the sums of elements of a rigid body, I follow it all except for one step. Here is a great page which shows the derivation nicely - http://www.kwon3d.com/theory/moi/iten.html
I follow clearly to the Eq. below

Homework Equations


$$H= \sum_{i} m_{i} [ r_{i}\wedge(\omega\wedge r_{i})] $$

The Attempt at a Solution


The link is as far as I could get, could someone please explain how it goes from the above Eq. to the 3 matrices in the next step?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited:
Thanks, indeed it does - "The vector cross product also can be expressed as the product of a skew-symmetric matrix and a vector" (not in my textbook, naughty, bad textbook :-))
I also did the (laborious) 'normal' triple vector product calculations, and happily ended with the same answer - guess which way I will be evaluating triple vector products from now on :-)
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
67
Views
4K