Angular momentum operator identity J²= J-J+ + J_3 + h*J_3 intermediate step

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the angular momentum operator identity, specifically the transitions between different forms of the equation. Participants express confusion about the equal signs in the derivation, particularly between the second and third expressions. The conversation highlights the use of ladder operators, \(\hat{J}_+\) and \(\hat{J}_-\), and the importance of commutators in simplifying the expressions. There is a suggestion to work backwards from the known identities to clarify the steps involved. The goal is to ensure that the manipulation of operators leads to the correct formulation of the angular momentum identity.
xyver
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I do not understand equal signs 2 and 3 the following Angular momentum operator identity:



Homework Equations


\hat{J}^2 = \hat{J}_1^2+\hat{J}_2^2 +\hat{J}_3^2

<br /> <br /> = \left(\hat{J}_1 +i\hat{J}_2 \right)\left(\hat{J}_1 -i\hat{J}_2 \right) +\hat{J}_3^2 + i \left[ \hat{J}_1, \hat{J}_2 \right]

<br /> = \hat{J}_+\hat{J}_- + \hat{J}_3^2 - \hbar \cdot \hat{J}_3

<br /> <br /> <br /> = \hat{J}_-\hat{J}_++ \hat{J}_3^2 + \hbar \cdot \hat{J}_3


\hat{J}_+ = \hat{J}_1 + i\hat{J}_2

\hat{J}_- = \hat{J}_1 - i\hat{J}_2


[\hat{J}_i,\hat{J}_j] = i\hbar\epsilon_{ijk}\hat{J}_k


The Attempt at a Solution


\hat{J}^2= \hat{J}_1^2+\hat{J}_2^2 +\hat{J}_3^2


= \left(\hat{J}_+ -i \hat{J}_2 \right)^2 \left( \frac{\hat{J}_+ -i \hat{J}_1 }{i}\right)^2 +\hat{J}_3^2

= \hat{J}_+^2 -i\hat{J}_+ \hat{J}_2 -i\hat{J}_2 \hat{J}_+ +i^2 \hat{J}_2^2 +\hat{J}_3^2 + \frac{\hat{J}_+^2 -i\hat{J}_+ \hat{J}_1 -i\hat{J}_1 \hat{J}_+ + \hat{J}_1^2 } {i^2} +\hat{J}_3^2




= \hat{J}_+^2 -i\hat{J}_+ \hat{J}_2 -i\hat{J}_2 \hat{J}_+ - \hat{J}_2^2 - \hat{J}_+^2 +\hat{J}_+ \hat{J}_1 +\hat{J}_1 \hat{J}_+ - \hat{J}_1^2 +\hat{J}_3^2

= -i\hat{J}_+ \hat{J}_2 -i\hat{J}_2 \hat{J}_+ - \hat{J}_2^2 +\hat{J}_+ \hat{J}_1 +\hat{J}_1 \hat{J}_+ - \hat{J}_1^2 +\hat{J}_3^2

Unfortunately, this does not lead to the right way. Who can help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try working backwards. The 1- and 2-components of J are being factored into ladder operators and a commutator is being added on to cancel the extra terms:

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> (J_1 + iJ_2)(J_1 - iJ_2) &amp;= J^2_1 + J^2_2 + iJ_2 J_1 - iJ_1 J_2\\<br /> &amp;= J^2_1 + J^2_2 -i [J_1, J_2]<br /> \end{align*}<br />

To get to the third expression from the second, replace the ladder operators with their synonyms (J +/-) and use a commutator identity.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top