Angular,rotational, translational and tangential velocity

AI Thread Summary
Angular and rotational velocity refer to the same concept, typically measured in degrees or radians per second, while rotational velocity is often expressed in revolutions per minute (rpm). Translational velocity is the standard measure of velocity in meters per second, representing linear motion. Tangential velocity is the component of translational velocity that acts in the tangential direction of a rotating object. For a rigid body rotating around a fixed axis, the tangential velocity at a distance r from the axis is calculated as ωr, where ω is the angular velocity. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for grasping the dynamics of rotating systems.
paperboy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
can someone please explain me the differences between angular, rotational, translational and tangential vecoity pls. I am struggling to understand how their differ from each other and how they are caluclated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi paperboy! :smile:

angular and rotational velocity are different names for the same thing

the usual name is angular velocity, measured in degrees per second or radians per second

it's called rotational velocity when it's measured in revolutions (ie "rotations") per second or, more usually, per minute (r.p.m.), see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_velocity" …
When measured in cycles or rotations per unit time (e.g. revolutions per minute), it is often called the rotational velocity and its magnitude the rotational speed

translational velocity just means ordinary velocity, measured in metres per second

tangential velocity is the component of ordinary (translational) velocity in the tangential direction

for example, if a rigid body is rotating about a fixed axis, with an angular velocity of ω radians per second, then any point at distance r metres from the axis will have a purely tangential velocity, of ωr metres per second
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thank you very much for the detailed answer!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top