Angular Speed and Energy Conservation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two cylinders with different masses and radii that eventually reach the same angular speed after interacting. The initial angular speed of the first cylinder is converted from revolutions per second to radians per second for calculations. The conservation of angular momentum is applied to find the final angular speed, resulting in a calculation of approximately 43.53 rad/s. The energy lost due to friction during the interaction is calculated to be about 51.17 J, highlighting the change in kinetic energy. Overall, the approach to solving the problem is deemed correct, despite a minor error regarding the use of angular momentum.
Sheneron
Messages
360
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Angular speed problem

Homework Statement


A cylinder with mass m1 = 4.00kg, and radius 30cm, rotates about a vertical, frictionless axle with angular velocity of 8.00 rev/s. A second cylinder, this one have a mass of m2 = 3.00kg, and radius 20cm, initially not rotating, drops onto the first cylinder. Because of friction between the surfaces, the two eventually reach the same angular speed.
A) calculate the final angular speed
B)Find the energy lost in the system due to the interaction of the two cylinders.

The Attempt at a Solution


Just wondering if this is right:

I converted the 8 rev/s to 50.265 rad/s. I wasn't sure if i needed to but I did it anyway.

L_{i} = L_{f}
I_{1}\omega_{1i}^2 = (I_{1} + I_{2})\omega_{f}^2
\omega_{f} = \sqrt{\frac{I_{1}\omega_{1i}^2}{(I_{1} + I_{2})}}
= \sqrt{\frac{(.5)(4)(0.3^2)(50.265^2)}{(0.5)(4)(0.3^2) + (0.5)(3)(0.2^2)}

= 43.53 rad/s

Then for part B, I found the loss of energy due to friction using the change in kinetic energy.

0.5(I_{1} + I_{2})\omega_{f}^2 - 0.5(I_{1})\omega_{f}^2^2
0.5[(0.5)(4)(0.3^2) + (0.5)(3)(0.2^2)](43.53)^2 - 0.5((.5)(4)(0.3^2)(50.265)^2 <br />

= 51.17 J

Did I solve this problem correctly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Angular momentum is L = I\omega. \omega is NOT squared.
 
crap. Other then that is that the right process (don't mind the numbers now)
 
Yes, I think your approach is OK.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top