Angular velocity and accelerating problem

AI Thread Summary
A disk with a constant angular acceleration of 2.0 rad/s² starts with an initial angular velocity of 5.0 rad/s and rotates through an angle of 11.0 radians. The user expresses confusion over applying the correct formulas for angular motion, noting that they find the problems more challenging than linear ones. Initial attempts to calculate the final angular velocity yielded incorrect results. After receiving guidance, the user acknowledges the need for better understanding of the rotational equations, which parallel linear kinematic equations. The discussion highlights the importance of using the correct formulas in solving angular motion problems.
reaperkid
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A disk accelerates with a constant angular acceleration of 2.0 rad/s2. If the initial angular velocity is 5.0 rad/s, what is the angular velocity of the disk after rotating though an angle of 11.0 radians?

a = 2 rad/s^2
vo = 5 rad/s
Theta = 11 rad

Homework Equations



a = v^2/r
v = change in theta/change in time

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm very confused on these angular problems. Everyone always tells me that they're just like the linear ones but I disagree. There's something big that I'm missing.

I tried a couple things since I couldn't find a good formula to use.

I tried.. 5 + 1/2(2)(11^2) which is wayy too high I'm thinking.

Then I tried 5 + 2*11 = 27 rad/s.. which is also wrong.

Clearly I'm very confused, can anyone help me on the right track?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LowlyPion said:
Keep in mind that the rotational equations are basically the analog of the linear kinematic equations.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/rotq.html#drot

Thank you very much! I got it now, I guess I should have searched harder for a good equation.

My fault.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top