Angular velocity and rotation matrix

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on expressing angular velocity \(\omega\) as a function of parameters \(\xi\) using rotation matrices. It establishes that the variation of vector \(r\) can be represented in two ways, leading to the expression for \(\omega\) as \(\omega = \frac{\delta \varphi}{dt}\). The angular velocity tensor \(W(t)\) is introduced, which operates similarly to the cross product with \(\vec{r}\). The relationship between the time derivative of the orientation matrix \(A(t)\) and the angular velocity tensor is also explored, concluding that \(W\) is a pseudotensor rather than a true tensor. This discussion provides a mathematical framework for understanding angular velocity in relation to rotation matrices.
srpvx
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello. Sorry for my English

There are R - rotation matrix (that performs transformation from associated coordinate system IE to static coordinate system OI) and \omega - angular velocity. The matrix R depends on parameters \xi (for example, Euler angles). I need to express \omega as function of \xi.

Let r^e - components of vector r in the associated coordinate system: r=Rr^{e} and r^{e}=R^{T}r. Than variation of vector r:
\delta r=\sum_{i}\frac{\partial Rr^{e}}{\partial\xi_{i}}\delta\xi_{i}= \sum_{i}\left(\frac{\partial R}{\partial\xi_{i}}\delta\xi_{i}\right)r^{e}= \sum_{i}\left(\frac{\partial R}{\partial\xi_{i}}\delta\xi_{i}\right)R^{T}r

On the other hand if I rotate r about l on angle \Delta\varphi then variation of r equals: \delta r=\Delta\varphi\left[l\times r\right]=\delta\varphi\times r, where \delta\varphi = \Delta \varphi l.

Comparing \delta r=\delta\varphi\times r with \delta r=\sum_{i}\left(\frac{\partial R}{\partial\xi_{i}}\delta\xi_{i}\right)R^{T}r, we get the following expression for omega:
\omega = \frac{\delta \varphi}{d t}
\left[\omega\times\right]=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}0 &amp; -\omega_{3} &amp; \omega_{2}\\<br /> \omega_{3} &amp; 0 &amp; -\omega_{1}\\<br /> -\omega_{2} &amp; \omega_{1} &amp; 0\end{array}\right)=\sum_{i}\left(\frac{\partial R}{\partial\xi_{i}}\dot{\xi_{i}}\right)R^{T}

Is it right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I found the answer on my question at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_velocity" :
It can be introduced from rotation matrices. Any vector \vec r that rotates around an axis with an angular speed vector \vec \omega (as defined before) satisfies:

\frac {d \vec r(t)} {dt} = \vec{\omega} \times\vec{r}

We can introduce here the '''angular velocity tensor''' associated to the angular speed \omega:

W(t) = \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 0 &amp; -\omega_z(t) &amp; \omega_y(t) \\<br /> \omega_z(t) &amp; 0 &amp; -\omega_x(t) \\<br /> -\omega_y(t) &amp; \omega_x(t) &amp; 0 \\<br /> \end{pmatrix}

This tensor W(t) will act as if it were a (\vec \omega \times) operator :

\vec \omega(t) \times \vec{r}(t) = W(t) \vec{r}(t)

Given the orientation matrix A(t) of a frame, we can obtain its instant '''angular velocity tensor''' W as follows. We know that:

\frac {d \vec r(t)} {dt} = W \cdot \vec{r}

As angular speed must be the same for the three vectors of a rotating frame A(t), we can write for all the three:

\frac {dA(t)} {dt} = W \cdot A (t)

And therefore the angular velocity tensor we are looking for is:

W = \frac {dA(t)} {dt} \cdot A^{-1}(t)

But W is not a tensor, W is a pseudotensor: W_{ij} = e_{iwj} \omega_{w}.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top