Angular Velocity: What's the Difference between Horizontal and Vertical Circles?

AI Thread Summary
Angular velocity is considered a scalar quantity, meaning there is no inherent difference between horizontal and vertical circles when viewed this way. However, as a vector, angular velocity points along different axes depending on the orientation of the circle; for example, it points along the z-axis for a horizontal circle and along the x-axis for a vertical circle. The discussion also touches on the conservation of energy, noting that in vertical circular motion, energy conservation principles apply differently than in horizontal motion, where angular velocity remains constant. The need for clarity in defining "horizontal" and "vertical" circles is emphasized, particularly in the context of angular velocity. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for applying the concepts in physics accurately.
Air
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
Can someone please explain the difference in Angular Velocity for a Horizontal and a Vertical circle? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you view it as a scalar quantity, there is none. Just by relabeling the x, y and z axis you can always get the circle to lie in the (x, y) plane and make it "horizontal". If you view the angular velocity as a vector, the difference will be that it points along one axis ("z") in one case and along another (e.g. "x") in the other.

So what exactly do you mean by "horizontal" and "vertical" circle, how do you define angular velocity and how would it be different?
 
I'm thinking of it in terms of conservation of energy. I believe Motion in a vertical circle, conservation of energy applies. In a horizontal v=(omega)r and omega is constant.

Can anyone explain this theory further?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top