Anitsymmetric tensor/switching indices problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter wasia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Indices
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of antisymmetric tensors, specifically the tensor components denoted as \(\omega^{\sigma\nu}\) and \(\omega_{\sigma\nu}\). It is established that while these tensors are antisymmetric, the transformation of indices (raising and lowering) does not preserve antisymmetry as stated in Srednicki's book. The Minkowski metric \(g_{\beta\sigma}\) is referenced, and participants confirm that the derivation involving the switching of indices is valid under the assumption that the metric is symmetric.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of antisymmetric tensors and their properties
  • Familiarity with the Minkowski metric in the context of general relativity
  • Knowledge of index notation and tensor operations
  • Basic principles of tensor algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of antisymmetric tensors in depth
  • Learn about the implications of the Minkowski metric in tensor calculus
  • Explore the concept of index raising and lowering in tensor analysis
  • Investigate the conditions under which a metric can be non-symmetric
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying general relativity or advanced tensor calculus who seek to deepen their understanding of tensor properties and operations.

wasia
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Let's say that some non-operator (having only numbers as it's components) tensor is antisymmetric:

\omega^{\sigma\nu}=-\omega^{\nu\sigma}
and
\omega_{\sigma\nu}=-\omega_{\nu\sigma},

however, I have read in the Srednicki book that it is incorrect to say that the same tensor with one index down and one up would be antisymmetric as well.

Could you please point out, where and what are the errors of the derivation? Should I read something before asking such questions? g here is the Minkowski metric:

\omega^{\nu}\,_{\sigma}=\omega^{\nu\beta}g_{\beta\sigma}=-\omega^{\beta\nu}g_{\beta\sigma}=-\omega_{\sigma}\,^{\nu}<br />

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wasia said:
Could you please point out, where and what are the errors of the derivation? Should I read something before asking such questions? g here is the Minkowski metric:

-\omega^{\beta\nu}g_{\beta\sigma}=-\omega_{\sigma}\,^{\nu}<br />

Shouldn't there be another step in between?
 
wasia said:
Could you please point out, where and what are the errors of the derivation? Should I read something before asking such questions? g here is the Minkowski metric:

\omega^{\nu}\,_{\sigma}=\omega^{\nu\beta}g_{\beta\sigma}=-\omega^{\beta\nu}g_{\beta\sigma}=-\omega_{\sigma}\,^{\nu}<br />

This should be fine. Notice that you switched which index was up and which was down.
 
xboy, the steps in between might be something like
-\omega^{\beta\nu}g_{\beta\sigma}=-\omega^{\beta\nu}g_{\sigma\beta}=-g_{\sigma\beta}\omega^{\beta\nu}=-\omega_\sigma\,^\nu
I assume they are valid, as g is undoubtly symmetric (at least in my case) and also g commutes with omega, as they contain only numbers.

Ben Niehoff, I do have noticed, that positions have changed.

However, if anyone could point out a mistake, or tell if that's correct, as Ben says, please do it.
 
Last edited:
Walia, your derivation seems correct to me. I can't think of a case of your derivation being invalid except for the metric being non-symmetric. But I don't know if the metric can be non-symmetric at all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K