Another logarithm simplification exercise.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around simplifying the logarithmic expression log_{10}(3/√(1+x)) into sums and differences of simpler logarithmic forms. The book provides an answer of 3log_{10}(x) - (1/2)log_{10}(1+x), which is questioned by the participants. They confirm that the original expression does not involve x as an exponent, leading to the conclusion that the book's answer may contain a typographical error. The participants agree that the correct interpretation of the problem is crucial for accurate simplification. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the importance of verifying the original problem statement in logarithmic exercises.
0range
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Write the quantity using sums and differences of simpler logarithmic expressions. Express the answer so that logarithms of products, quotients, and powers do not appear.

log_{10}\frac{3}{\sqrt{1+x}}


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



2czc1sh.jpg


The book's answer, however, is 3log_{10}x-\frac{1}{2}log_{10}(1+x)

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
0range said:

Homework Statement



Write the quantity using sums and differences of simpler logarithmic expressions. Express the answer so that logarithms of products, quotients, and powers do not appear.

log_{10}\frac{3}{\sqrt{1+x}}


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



2czc1sh.jpg


The book's answer, however, is 3log_{10}x-\frac{1}{2}log_{10}(1+x)

Thanks in advance!

Check the original question to make sue the numerator is just 3 and not an exponential
 
Hi, thanks for the reply.

No, the original equation is as appears.
 
Must be a typo in the book, then. Possibly whoever typed up the answer key thought that the problem was
log_{10}\frac{x^3}{\sqrt{1+x}}
 
Oh, so I'm right? How anti-climatic...

Thanks again.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Back
Top