Another notation for the dual space

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
My professor uses the notation Hom(V,\mathbb{R}) for the dual space of V. I usually see V* rather. What does the notation Hom(V,\mathbb{R}) stands for exactly? I suppose the domain of Hom is wider than just (vector spaces) x (their field).

The notation suggest it is the set of homomorphisms btw V and R, but this would not accurately describe V* because we want the elements of V* to be linear fct, not just group homomorphisms (we need the f(av)=af(v) part of linear too).

So does the notation comes from a more category theory perspective, where linear maps are considered as "vector space homomorphisms" or something like that?

Just thoughts. I just want to know what the general meaning for Hom is. Thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the definition of the dual space that you have that is _not_ homs into the underlying field? Hom, in the category of vector spaces _means_ linear map. It is nothing to do with group homomorphisms.
 
The dual space of V to me is the vector space V* of all linear functions from V to its underlying field.

It's the first time I see the notation Hom being used for anything at all, so I am asking what it means in the most general context. Thank you.
 
quasar987 said:
The dual space of V to me is the vector space V* of all linear functions from V to its underlying field.

It's the first time I see the notation Hom being used for anything at all, so I am asking what it means in the most general context. Thank you.

Hom(X, Y) is the object of all maps from X to Y.

The precise meaning of 'object' and 'map' depends on the context. In this case, 'object' means 'vector space' and 'map' means 'linear transformation'.
 
Hurkyl said:
Hom(X, Y) is the object of all maps from X to Y.

The precise meaning of 'object' and 'map' depends on the context. In this case, 'object' means 'vector space' and 'map' means 'linear transformation'.
I should add...

Let T : Y->W and S : X->Z be linear.
Hom(X, T) is the obvious map Hom(X, Y) -> Hom(X, W).
Hom(S, Y) is the obvious map Hom(Z, Y) -> Hom(X, Y).
Hom(S, T) is the obvious map Hom(Z, Y) -> Hom(X, W).
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top