Another play with numbers website

  • Thread starter Thread starter suyver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
AI Thread Summary
The website in question utilizes a mathematical trick based on the properties of numbers in a base-10 system, specifically focusing on divisibility by 9. Users input a 3 or 4 digit number, randomize its digits, and then subtract the smaller number from the larger to obtain a new number. The key insight is that the resulting number is always divisible by 9, allowing the website to deduce a missing digit based on the sum of the remaining digits. By calculating the remainder when the sum is divided by 9, the site can determine the unknown digit. The discussion highlights the importance of not including zero in the initial number to avoid ambiguity in the result.
suyver
Messages
247
Reaction score
0
Another "play with numbers" website

http://digicc.com/fido/

It's probably related to the fact that we have a base-10 number system, but I fail to see how it works...

This website does the following:
1) You write down a 3 or 4 digit number, say X=x1 x2 x3 x4 (where the x's denote the digits).
2) You randomize the digits and obtain another number, say Y=x3 x2 x4 x1.
3) You subtract the largest from the smallest one. (call this one Z=z1 z2 z3 z4)
4) You select one of the digits from this number (say z3) and write the remaining numbers in any order, say z4 z1 z2 in my example.
5) Somehow, the website then tells you what the selected digit was (the z3 in my case) based only on this remaining number.

Can someone explain in some more detail what the trick is?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
OK, I got slightly further: My number Z=X-Y (X>Y) must be devidable by 9, right?

Is it then just the case that because the website knows that the number I imput plus the unknown digit must be dividable by 9, the value of the unknown digit can be determined? I.E.: Because it knows that the number (z4 z1 z3 UNKNOWN) is devidable by 9, and because it knows z4, z1 and z3, it can determine the value for the UNKNOWN, since z4+z1+z3+UNKNOWN must be devidable by 9?
 
OK, I think I completed the answer to my own question (great forum, this is! ;-)

This trick is that the website divides the number that I imput by 9 to see what remainder is left.
If it's 0, the missing digit had to be 9.
If it's 1, the missing digit had to be 8.
If it's 2, the missing digit had to be 7.
If it's 3, the missing digit had to be 6.
If it's 4, the missing digit had to be 5.
If it's 5, the missing digit had to be 4.
If it's 6, the missing digit had to be 3.
If it's 7, the missing digit had to be 2.
If it's 8, the missing digit had to be 1.

Is this correct?
 
There is perhaps the issu to be got round of: if the remainder is 0, then the missing digit might be 0 (it is congruent to zero mod 9 and there are two possbilities) of course there should be some reason why one of these can't happen, or there might be other reasons that allow you to decide which of these possibilites is true if both can occur
 
Good point! That must be why you are not allowed to choose a zero in the link that I gave.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top