Complex Valued Functions BV: John B. Conway Prop 1.3 Explained

In summary, a complex valued function is a function that maps complex numbers to complex numbers. John B. Conway Prop 1.3 states that every complex valued function can be written as the sum of an even function and an odd function, allowing for simplification and better understanding. This proposition also helps in solving complex valued functions by breaking them into smaller, easier to solve parts. Examples of complex valued functions include polynomial, trigonometric, exponential, and logarithmic functions. Lastly, complex valued functions and real valued functions are related in that a real valued function can be seen as a special case of a complex valued function, where the complex part is equal to zero.
  • #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
3,990
48
I am reading John B. Conway's book, "Functions of a Complex Variable I" (Second Edition) ...

I am currently focussed on Chapter IV: Complex Integration ... Section 1: Riemann-Stieljes Integral ... ...

I need help in fully understanding another aspect of the proof of Proposition 1.3 ...Proposition 1.3 and its proof read as follows:View attachment 7439
View attachment 7440
View attachment 7441
In the above text from Conway we read the following:

" ... ... Hence

\(\displaystyle
\int_a^b \lvert \gamma' (t) \rvert \ dt \le \epsilon + \sum_{ k = 1 }^m \lvert \gamma' ( \tau_k ) \rvert ( t_k - t_{ k - 1 } )\)\(\displaystyle = \epsilon + \sum_{ k = 1 }^m \left\lvert \int_{ t_{ k-1 }}^{ t_k } \gamma' ( \tau_k ) dt \right\rvert \) ... ..."
Can someone please explain exactly how/why \(\displaystyle \sum_{ k = 1 }^m \lvert \gamma' ( \tau_k ) \rvert ( t_k - t_{ k - 1 } ) = \sum_{ k = 1 }^m \left\lvert \int_{ t_{ k-1 }}^{ t_k } \gamma' ( \tau_k ) dt \right\rvert\)as is implied by the above quote from Conway ... ...?*** NOTE *** Seems as if Conway is treating \(\displaystyle \gamma' ( \tau_k )\) as a constant ... but why ...?Help will be much appreciated ... ...

Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It's because, for all $k$, $$\lvert \gamma'(\tau_k)\rvert(t_k - t_{k-1}) = \lvert \gamma'(\tau_k)(t_k-t_{k-1})\rvert = \left\lvert \int_{t_{k-1}}^{t_k} \gamma'(\tau_k)\, dt\right\rvert$$
 
  • #3
Euge said:
It's because, for all $k$, $$\lvert \gamma'(\tau_k)\rvert(t_k - t_{k-1}) = \lvert \gamma'(\tau_k)(t_k-t_{k-1})\rvert = \left\lvert \int_{t_{k-1}}^{t_k} \gamma'(\tau_k)\, dt\right\rvert$$
Sorry to be slow Euge ...

... but I do not see why \(\displaystyle \lvert \gamma'(\tau_k)(t_k-t_{k-1})\rvert = \left\lvert \int_{t_{k-1}}^{t_k} \gamma'(\tau_k)\, dt\right\rvert\)Can you help further ...

hmm ... but maybe I guess that although \(\displaystyle \gamma' \) is not a constant ... \(\displaystyle \gamma'( \tau_k)\) is a constant, say \(\displaystyle \gamma'( \tau_k) = K\) and so

\(\displaystyle \int_{t_{k-1}}^{t_k} \gamma'(\tau_k) dt = \int_{t_{k-1}}^{t_k}K dt = K ( {t_{k-1}} - {t_k} )
\)Is that correct?

Peter
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Since $\gamma'$ is a complex-valued function, $\gamma'(\tau_k)$ is a complex number, not a complex function as it appeared you were thinking. Your integral calculation is correct.
 

What is the definition of a complex valued function?

A complex valued function is a function that maps complex numbers to complex numbers. It can be defined as f: C → C, where C is the set of complex numbers.

What is the significance of John B. Conway Prop 1.3 in complex valued functions?

John B. Conway Prop 1.3 is a proposition that states that every complex valued function can be written as the sum of an even function and an odd function. This is significant because it allows for simplification and better understanding of complex valued functions.

How does John B. Conway Prop 1.3 help in solving complex valued functions?

John B. Conway Prop 1.3 helps in solving complex valued functions by breaking down the function into its even and odd components, which can then be solved separately. This can make the solution process easier and more efficient.

What are some examples of complex valued functions?

Some examples of complex valued functions include polynomial functions, trigonometric functions, exponential functions, and logarithmic functions. These functions can take complex numbers as inputs and produce complex numbers as outputs.

What is the relationship between complex valued functions and real valued functions?

Complex valued functions and real valued functions are related in that a real valued function can be seen as a special case of a complex valued function, where the complex part is equal to zero. This means that all properties and techniques used for real valued functions can also be applied to complex valued functions.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
1
Views
770
Replies
2
Views
886
Back
Top